Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EMG pickups

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by toejam View Post
    Which "old" Metallica albums are you talking about? He didn't start using them until Justice.
    Justice, Black, Kirk on MOP and Ride?

    Originally posted by Hellbat View Post
    "I have been told..."
    Bravo
    sigpic
    Action Jackson

    Comment


    • #17
      I'm indifferent to the "vanilla" EMG's, but I love the 81X/85X combo in my PRS Torero SE (I upgraded from the regular 81/85). I also love the 81X/SAX/SAX setup I put in my Model 4. They don't sound interchagable in the bridge position to me, so I call shennanigans on the "all EMG equipped axes sound the same" argument.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SausageofPower View Post
        shenanigans
        Fixed "Hey Farva, whats that place you like to go eat with all the goofy shit on the walls?"
        HTTP 404 - Signature Not Found

        Comment


        • #19
          ^ "it smells like sex in here"
          sigpic
          Action Jackson

          Comment


          • #20
            I've owned several guitars with EMGs including the 81, 85, and 60. They absolutely sound different in different guitars. People who say otherwise are either tone deaf or just repeating what they've read other people say on the internet.

            My opinion: with high gain, I love'em. With cleans, I hate'em. I don't like dealing with the 9 volt battery but at the same time I HATE guitars that have a separate rout for battery access.

            Summary: great for metal guitars where you'll be playing with gain 99% of the time. As I get older, I play metal less, so I'm less drawn to EMG pickups. But they do what they do great.

            Comment


            • #21
              I reckon, most opinions about EMG's sounding same come from people (a.k.a kids or budding artists just to be politically correct) who save up enough to buy their favorite artist's signature model which usually comes with EMG's but forget the other part of the equation; i.e the amp. A EMG equipped mahogany guitar vs Alder guitar will sound the same through a Crate combo.

              BTW, what's different in the "X" versions? Less trebly? more bassy? It still has an internal preamp right?
              Sam

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Chad View Post
                I've owned several guitars with EMGs including the 81, 85, and 60. They absolutely sound different in different guitars. People who say otherwise are either tone deaf or just repeating what they've read other people say on the internet.

                My opinion: with high gain, I love'em. With cleans, I hate'em. I don't like dealing with the 9 volt battery but at the same time I HATE guitars that have a separate rout for battery access.

                Summary: great for metal guitars where you'll be playing with gain 99% of the time. As I get older, I play metal less, so I'm less drawn to EMG pickups. But they do what they do great.
                pretty much this. emg-> high gain amp? cannot be beat, IMO.
                Its a complete catastrophe. But Im a professional, I can rise above it. LOL

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by emperor_black View Post
                  BTW, what's different in the "X" versions? Less trebly? more bassy? It still has an internal preamp right?
                  My understanding is the pre-amp is a new design on them with lower noise and better headroom, but otherwise they aren't significantly different from the older series. But I have been wrong before. Possibly even in this very thread.
                  GTWGITS! - RacerX

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I definitely hear differences in different guitars, that is definitely BS.. And also, recently noticed how much difference there was in the tone of my RM100 with high gain modules. With my SD Custom and DMZ TZ soloists the modules sounded great.. With the EMG 81??? Holy fucking shit! Much more raw and driven (for lack of a better term).. Made the TZ and Custom sound like low output, lower gain pups. Just with that amp though.. Just something else I've noted..

                    I'm also not in the camp of them sounding bad clean. I did a cover of Tesla - Only You with a DKMG (81 in bridge) with a 12 string-ish patch through my POD 2.0. Sounded great!

                    Question? I have this Soloist Pro set up with 81/S (no middle). I find the S in the neck a bit too bright. I have an SA I could try. Think the SA's a little warmer?
                    Every man dies... Not every man really lives!!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Twitch View Post
                      Fixed "Hey Farva, whats that place you like to go eat with all the goofy shit on the walls?"
                      Oops. Thanks dude.

                      Originally posted by emperor_black View Post
                      BTW, what's different in the "X" versions? Less trebly? more bassy? It still has an internal preamp right?
                      The main selling point is the headroom. They basically gave them the headroom of the originals with an 18v mod, only running on 9v instead. I like 'em, but then again I haven't had the cash to A/B them against pricier counterparts.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Sweet, it sounds like we've reached a clear consensus regarding the "EMG sounding similar" issue. So I guess we don't need to debate that ever again.
                        _________________________________________________
                        "Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
                        - Ken M

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Axewielder View Post
                          Sweet, it sounds like we've reached a clear consensus regarding the "EMG sounding similar" issue. So I guess we don't need to debate that ever again.
                          Just like all those other topics we put and end to on this forum!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            another option if you wanted, are the new emg sig hetfield pickups, they are modeled after the 81 and 60 but are passive, i dont remember where but i read they were very good.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by petez0r View Post
                              another option if you wanted, are the new emg sig hetfield pickups, they are modeled after the 81 and 60 but are passive, i dont remember where but i read they were very good.
                              They're still active but have some passive qualities to them.
                              I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                didnt know that i thought i read they were passive!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X