Originally posted by jgcable
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Help me out, guys: Marshall JVM410H/210H vs. EVH 5150 III vs. Splawn Quick Rod
Collapse
X
-
-
There is also a new B+ option withthe Splawn that is supposed to give it more sag/be more forgiving.
Leave a comment:
-
No question... I have heard an owned all of these amps. The Splawn Quickrod is head and shoulders better sounding than the other amps. The cleans are great and the amp is totally forgiving. Its incredible.
Leave a comment:
-
Haven't seen a bad review on the EVH...I had a tough time deciding between that or the Mark V. Also I like the combos better than a half stacks. The EVH combo seems pretty killer but probably heavy as hell.
Leave a comment:
-
I play my 5150 III head through an Orange closed back 2x12 with V30's. It sounds massive and would probably work for just about any situation. That being said, there is that extra oomph with a 4x12 moving all that air! I have an old Marshall 4x12 that I put Warehouse Retro 30's in and it sounds amazing for far less than a 1960 AV. I play the Powerball II through that cab. ; )
Leave a comment:
-
There's one thing that bugs me. I know it shouldn't, but it does. I'm not sure I'll be satisfied with a 2x12 cab for the 5150, so I would want the 4x12. Used ones are a bit scarce and new ones are about a grand. I can grab a used Marshall 1960A or B for about $400.00.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigE13 View PostIf you must have reverb, get a great pedal so you can apply the right amount of flavor without being limited by what the amp can provide. Good luck these are all great amps!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by P I K A View PostI believe that Marshall is noisy on hi gain settings.
Leave a comment:
-
The JVM is a great amp and the noise on high gain can be tamed with a NSP, the tone is fantastic. My best friend plays the 205H in his band and through a Dave Mustaine 4x12 it absolutely kills at high volume. The 5150 III is a phenominal amp that I agree with everyone that you can get great tone at any volume level. I have both the JVM410HJS and the 5150 III (50 watt) heads plus a ENGL Powerball II that is amazing and beats both the Marshall and the EVH on cleans and matches up very well on crunch and high gain settings. I gravitate to the Powerball the most. If you must have reverb, get a great pedal so you can apply the right amount of flavor without being limited by what the amp can provide. Good luck these are all great amps!
Leave a comment:
-
I've gigged with a 2006 QR for about the past 5 years. Great workhorse. It will do the 80s thing for sure. It is unforgiving to some degree, boost it with a pedal and it loosens up a bit.
Here's my amp with V30s and a Dimarzio Distortion, gear 2 with reverb in the loop. It's recorded at my gig (small club) volumes, about 1-2'sh (out of 10).
Leave a comment:
-
If you go with the 5150iii combo you will have reverb on board and better tone at low volume compared to the splawn.
Leave a comment:
-
Here watch this vid a little goofy at times but has a some good tones .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxUuXyXPhpY
Leave a comment:
-
yes hes right the jvm does have some noise to it, but didnt matter that much. tone is really a preference.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe that Marshall is noisy on hi gain settings . The Splawns sound good LOUD . The EVH is the ticket it sounds good at all volumes and is built really well as is the Splawn. Not sure about Marshall. Ive had 2 Splawns and while they are great tone it wont get there without it being cranked up.
Leave a comment:
-
splawns are great but id go for the jvm. i had a few 5150s. not the III but the jvm can do alot, splawns are known for doing what theyre designed to do, but dont seem to have much in style range.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: