Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

    Hi,

    I have a trade offer at a music store. I can trade my Carvin SX200 + some other gear for a Line 6 Spider amp. It is the first model, however, and I'm wondering if I would be better off getting the Spider II.

    Does anyone know if there is much difference between the two amps? (spider and spider 2)

    thanks

  • #2
    Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

    The Spider 2 is lightyears better than the original Spider.
    You should keep your SX200 and the "other gear".

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

      i second that. the original spider series aren't even remotely similar to the 2nd series. the spider II is actually a decent amp, imo one could even play gigs with it, and you can definitely dial in some at least usable sounds.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

        Avoid the original Spider series at all costs, IMO...You most likely get better tone out of the SX
        Dreaded Silence - Boston Melancholic Metal

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

          thanks for the advise... I'll be passing this offer up.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

            THe only head by Line 6 I ever liked was the Flextone HD II.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

              The Spider 2 amp is nice. I've got the 75 watter I use as a practice amp in the house (my main amp is a Mesa Boogie triple recto into 2 4x12 cabs) Granted, this little combo ain't a Mesa, but it's a sweet ass amp. I was too lazy to carry my cab and my head in a road case to my car in my garage from my house, so I just took this little 75 watter and an amp stand to band practice. Cut through the mix, and sounded nice.

              The ONLY issues I have are, the louder you turn it, it requires drastic EQ (I mean like over half volume) to make it sound nice, and the fact it's a 300$ amp, no footswitch, and the footy is like 70$ i believe.

              The good news, FX, you can have 3 at the same time. One being reverb, since it has it's own knob. Chorus/flange, phaser, tremelo on the other knob, and the last has delay, tape echo, and another echo. It has a tuner, a noise gate (don't turn it off) and 4 channels that you can store anyway you want, with 12 sound selections to choose from, and sculpt with the EQ.

              Nice amp for the bucks.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

                Agreed on the II (I owned one for a year before getting my Laney VC50). The I is garbage though.
                Dreaded Silence - Boston Melancholic Metal

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

                  From what I've heard the Spider 2 is a huge improvement over the original. I had a Spider 112. It was OK for home and I did some acoustic gigs with it too. Other than that, only to be used as a doorstop.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Line 6 Spider vs. Spider II

                    II ...bought one for my son...its a great little amp for the money..
                    "Bill, Smoke a Bowl and Crank Van Halen I, Life is better when I do that"
                    Donnie Swanstrom 01/25/06..miss ya!

                    "Well, your friend would have Bell's Palsy, which is a facial paralysis, not "Balls Pelsy" like we're joking about here." Toejam's attempt at sensitivity.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X