If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I went with the industry standard style of parametric. I would think that if a tube driven parametric is better than a SS version, they would be alot more popular.
heheh, I'd love to get a parametric EQ, but they're so rare it seems. The only one I've found is the Rane PE 17 for £558! (about $1100 or thereabouts) don't think it'd be worth it as it'd be the most expensive thing in my rack (even more than my vht power amp)... [img]/images/graemlins/what.gif[/img]
baws to that...
Forgive my ignorance.. we all gotta ask questions and learn right?
With all this EQ talk...
What is the difference between parametric, and graphic EQ?
Never used one. I had a buddy that had a more defined toned with a peavey ultra plus when I'de turn his eq thingie on his rack on.
[ QUOTE ]
heheh, I'd love to get a parametric EQ, but they're so rare it seems. The only one I've found is the Rane PE 17 for £558! (about $1100 or thereabouts) don't think it'd be worth it as it'd be the most expensive thing in my rack (even more than my vht power amp)... [img]/images/graemlins/what.gif[/img]
baws to that...
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeouch!!! I just got a PE17 on Ebay for $175.
I want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.
yeah, I'd consider it but I wouldn't want to have to get a transformer just for a rack eq. I don't suppose any of those EQs have switchable voltage so I could use an import from the US at 240v?
Comment