Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mesa Express 5:50 Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mesa Express 5:50 Review

    I picked up a Mesa Express 5:50 a week and a half ago, and thought I'd give you a review of its performance.

    A month ago, I had no intentions of buying a new amp. I was planning on picking up a Music Man Petrucci signature 6-string, with piezo. The problem is that my guitar amp (Zwengel half stack, shown farther below) really doesn't do cleans. Vintage crunch? Yep. Blues? Yep. AC/DC to Metallica gain? Yep. Cleans? Nope; at least not at any significant volume with a humbucker. Now, the Zwengel (which is an all-tube, hand wired 50 Watt head made by Carl Zwengel in Chicago) has killer tone on all that it does; it just lives in the middle of the gain curve; no cleans, and no death metal; just low crunch to high crunch. But it does it REALLY well.

    Anyway, I wanted a Petrucci with Piezo. But, as I got to thinking, I realized that a Piezo guitar wasn't much good if I didn't have a clean amp to run it into. So, I shifted gears and decided to pick up an amp that could do cleans really well. I was looking at Fenders, and then decided to go with something that could also do higher gain well, since I can't really take the Zwengel anywhere. I am too old and too lazy to haul a half-stack up a flight of basement stairs to go jam, and then haul it back down. So a portable all-arounder, with an emphasis on good cleans, was my target.

    Oh yeah, I should probably mention, I am a tube snob. Always have been, even before I could afford tube amps. So a solid state amp or modeler was simply not an option.

    I auditioned an Express 5:50 at the GC in Edina, MN. Please note that this is one of GC's "platinum" stores; they had Frankenstein, the EVH head and cabs, a Music Man Petrucci BFR-1 (only fifteen were sent to Guitar Centers nationwide). The staff is knowledgable, they store is clean, well organized, the effects displays all are in working order, etc. And they always let me go into the high-end Amp room and wail. Point is, it's a good store, and good people work there.

    After three separate visits and auditions, I decided it sounded good to me. I picked up the 2x12 for 1299.00. Of course they can't negotiate on Mesa amps, so I picked up a Boss pedal board and some cables for next to nothing. I decided on the 2x12 since a 1x12 would look ridiculous next to my half stack.

    Crappy pic #1:


    Crappy Pic number 2:


    Express 5:50 2x12 Features:
    Two channels
    Channel 1: Clean/Crunch (selectable)
    Channel 2: Blues/Burn (selectable)
    Switchable 5W/50W (Class A/Class AB) mode (global, not per channel)
    Channel independant reverb
    Treble, mid, bass controls for each channel
    "Countour" (EQ curve) blend, adjustable per channel
    2 x 6L6 Power section
    5 x 12AX7 Preamp section
    Removable Casters
    Footswitch Included
    Serial Effects loop
    Weight: My right arm is now longer than my left.

    All tone evals below were made with my SLATQH loaded with the stock Duncans.

    Channel 1 / Clean:
    Like I said, I mainly bought this amp to serve as my "clean channel" in my setup. It really shines in this area. You can get superb cleans at a nice loud level by dialing the gain to 12:00 and the master to 1:00, or you can dial the gain up to 3:00 and the master down to get a slight breakup. I tend to use this configuration in 50W mode, although it should have some good low-volume breakup in 5W mode. I predominantly use the neck pickup for this channel.

    Channel 1 / Crunch:
    I haven't played with this mode a whole lot yet. Sorry.

    Channel 2 / Blues:
    This mode works well with the 5/50W switch set to 5 watts. I'm not much of a blues player, but found inspiration in the tone to fire off a couple bluesy licks. The neck pickup seemed to be the best pickup for this channel.

    Channel 2 / Burn:
    This channel may disappoint some Mesa fans; we are not talking Rectifier levels of gain here. I find it quite sufficient for playing Ratt and some Metallica / Queensryche. If your into death metal or Marilyn Manson, your going to need a boost pedal or need to look elsewhere in the Mesa product line. For me, I find it perfectly adequate for my style of music, and I have a distortion pedal if I need Ubergain. I personally like the sound of this channel. I did plug my RR1T loaded with 81/85 EMGs into this channel and did get some additional kick due to the pickups. I just don't dig that EMG tone a whole lot. I don't want to give the impression that this channel is anemic; for many, it will have as much gain as you need. Some people will not be satisfied, however. Bridge pickup is perfect for rythm and lead, but neck pickup produces some very cool lead tones as well.

    The "Contour" knob for each channel blends in what Mesa calls the "Classic Mesa Mark IV EQ "V" curve". Consider it a Bass boost/Mid cut/Treble boost tone knob. It can be disabled if desired, either form the front panel or the foot switch.

    The Express series replaces Mesa's "F" series (F-30/F-50/F-100) of amps. One of the guys I jam with has an F-100, which is a fine amp. I like the Express better in terms of overall tone and better features in most areas. I do believe he can get more gain from his amp, but I don't find it as pleasing to the ear as the Express.

    One overall big plus for this amp is the nice tones you can get at relatively low volume, both in the 5W and 50W modes. That is one thing my Zwengel can not do; that baby has to be quite loud to get the warm tube sound from it.

    Gripes:
    Would have liked a 100W model to select from (maybe an Express 10:100...) as well to get a bit more headroom on the cleans. Although realistically, it does get pretty damn loud before it breaks up.

    I am hearing a slight glassy rattle when I play certain notes when the amp is turned up. I will bring it to a Mesa service center so they can track it down.

    Would have liked a Parallel effects loop.

    Would have liked the 5/50W mode selectable per channel instead of globally.

    But hey, nothing is perfect. No amp does everything. More features means more complexity, more circuits, more traces, and as a result, less tone (for those who disagree, come listen to my point-to-point wired Zwengel). So you need to draw the line somewhere.

    I am quite happy with it, and have finally started enjoying it instead of trying to determine if I liked it enough to keep it. I am learning that Mesa Amps need gentle tweeking to dial your tone in over time; you can't do it in 20 minutes. I am pretty much there, though. Time to document my setting before my kids start playing with the knobs.

    If you made it this far, thanks for reading!


    - Eric
    Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

  • #2
    I forgot to mention; it also comes with a pretty nice amp cover, with the Mesa logo embroidered on the front.

    Classy.


    - E.
    Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

    Comment


    • #3
      Nice review! I've got a few of these in stock if anyone's interested.

      Matt
      Special deals for JCF members on Jackson/Charvel, Suhr, Anderson, Nash, Splawn, Bogner, LSL, Ibanez, Diezel, Friedman, Bad Cat, 3rd Power, Dr. Z, ENGL and more. FREE SHIPPING! 0% FINANCING!

      Comment


      • #4
        Eric - thanks for the review - sounds cool!

        If you want a parallel loop you have options. Psionic Audio and Suhr both make mini-mixers for exactly this purpose. They aren't typical mixers with knobs and all that, they literally mix two signals and that's it. They look like stomp boxes. The key here is that they are specifically designed for guitar rigs. Psionic offers an optional "dry kill" for those times where you actually want 100% wet.

        Last time I checked Suhr doesn't show it on his site but you can call and order one.

        I've dealt with Psionic Audio on a number of things - I've got a couple Lumos boxes from them. Here's the mixer page: http://psionicaudio.com/main/mixers.htm
        I want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.

        - Newc

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks, Tim!

          Parallel effects loops just make the most sense to me for some reason. The Mesa instructions do state that the loop works best for rack processors and if you want to use pedals you should put them at the input, but I'll look into the Psionic stuff anyway.

          - Eric
          Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

          Comment


          • #6
            Eric - just to be clear, the Psionic stuff is designed to work with rack processors in the loop.
            I want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.

            - Newc

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hippietim View Post
              Eric - just to be clear, the Psionic stuff is designed to work with rack processors in the loop.
              Sounds like a conspiracy against me. I do not like this one bit.

              I do have a TC Electronics G Major that just didn't gel with my Zwengel. I'll have to give it a try with the Mesa. I would like to put it to use.


              - E.
              Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

              Comment


              • #8
                A competent tech might be able to mod the loop for you. Changing the parallel to series is pretty easy on the F Series, so maybe doing a conversion would not be so bad on the express.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Good review, though I am kind of flabbergasted as to why you'd buy an Express for your cleansound needs.
                  You took too much, man. Too much. Too much.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by AlexL View Post
                    Thanks, Tim!

                    Parallel effects loops just make the most sense to me for some reason.
                    Why on earth would anyone prefer parallel?? Are there ANY advantages at all of parallel over serial??

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by kokostrollet View Post
                      Why on earth would anyone prefer parallel?? Are there ANY advantages at all of parallel over serial??
                      Parallel means that your raw signal is mixed with the effected signal whereas a series loop means you get whatever comes out of the processor. It sounds quite different.
                      I want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.

                      - Newc

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by GodOfRhythm View Post
                        Good review, though I am kind of flabbergasted as to why you'd buy an Express for your cleansound needs.
                        Ever heard one?

                        - E.
                        Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by kokostrollet View Post
                          Why on earth would anyone prefer parallel?? Are there ANY advantages at all of parallel over serial??
                          It keeps the tone purer, since some of the original dry signal is retained, as opposed to sending the entire signal through the effects chain.


                          - E.
                          Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by AlexL View Post
                            Ever heard one?

                            - E.
                            Yeah, Leo Caerts had one on the floor, and there's amps out there suited better for my cleantone needs (which are minimal at best, anyways ). Anyways different strokes for different people I guess!
                            You took too much, man. Too much. Too much.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by GodOfRhythm View Post
                              Yeah, Leo Caerts had one on the floor, and there's amps out there suited better for my cleantone needs (which are minimal at best, anyways ). Anyways different strokes for different people I guess!
                              Yes indeed.

                              A Fender Twin may have gotten me marginally better cleans, but I didn't feel that would be as good an amp as the Mesa for high gain. Plus the other features of the Mesa made it more attractive to me.


                              - E.
                              Good Lord! The rod up that man's butt must have a rod up its butt!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X