Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tried a Solo 50 and a V3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tried a Solo 50 and a V3

    I just tried a few amps on Monday, and I thought I'd pass along my thoughts.

    First up was a single Recto 212 combo. It took awhile to warm up. I had this one in one of the quieter rooms, so I could let it loose a bit. After a few minutes of noodling and not really being impressed, it started to wake up nicely (I know tube amps like to warm up, but this one took longer than I'm used to). Nice clean tone on the first channel. The second channel was pretty darn grindy, but you could also back off it and get a more hard rock rather then metal tone out of it. Great on the pinchar harmomics, and it's nice and responsive for hammer-ons, pull-offs and the like. It made a good impression in about 20 minutes of playing time, and I'd really like to play one in a band situation. I also like the footswitchable "solo" feature, which is essentially a boost.

    Next was a used Carvin V3. It had some dust on it, and the cool metal front panel was peeling off. This thing is also festooned in knobs, switches, toggles, sliders and probably a retinal scanner that I didn't notice. Still, it was a really good-sounding amp. I didn't get to wring it out quite as much, only about 10 minutes in the main showroom. The clean channel is labeled #3, oddly enough. #1 was pretty much appropriate for your NWOBHM and hard rock, while #2 was more the modern-metal side. Also speedy and responsive like the boogie. Very grinding and modern sounding.

    Obviously, I didn't get to know either of them really well, but I could see the potential for really liking them. I probably favor the Boogie because it seems a lot more straightforward.

  • #2
    One the V3, I read that channel 1 and 2 are the same channels. Since each has it own gain/EQ section, you can change the sound of each but if you put all the knobs in the same position for each channel, you'll get the same sound.

    joe...
    www.godwentpunk.com
    www.myspace.com/godwentpunk

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by GodWentPUNK View Post
      One the V3, I read that channel 1 and 2 are the same channels. Since each has it own gain/EQ section, you can change the sound of each but if you put all the knobs in the same position for each channel, you'll get the same sound.

      joe...
      That is correct.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jgcable View Post
        That is correct.
        Ah, that's interesting. I didn't even think to try that.

        Comment


        • #5
          The V3 rocks. New metal, old metal... any metal. It can cover it all. It also has 2 smart loops which are the greatest thing since ATM videos.

          Comment


          • #6
            The V3 was interesting, lot of knobs, I wish we could have blasted it. We probably should have just wheeled it into the room with the Recotverb. I definitely liked both the V3 and the Rectoverb better than the MTS3200 my brother just bought.

            Funny, on the V3 we didn't realize that #3 was the clean channel so I had the gain turned way down on channel 1 to try to clean it up.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by GodWentPUNK View Post
              One the V3, I read that channel 1 and 2 are the same channels. Since each has it own gain/EQ section, you can change the sound of each but if you put all the knobs in the same position for each channel, you'll get the same sound.

              joe...
              I read that too, but my V3s second channel has a little more gain and, although i can get close, i cannot make them sound identical. Still it is a killer amp that can acheive a lot of metal tones and at a great price.

              Comment

              Working...
              X