How about a Laney? Tried one out in a guitar shop yesterday alongside a Fender Deluxe and Marshall DSL and was pleasantly surprised - clean tones different to the other two but nice, very jangly like a Vox.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Low wattage tube amp for cleans?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Spivonious View PostAny tube amp is too loud for an apartment, unless you have understanding neighbors. However, for a small tube amp recommendation, I'll say the Crate Palomino. Takes pedals well, and sounds okay at lower volumes.
Yup. Small tube amps dont equal low volume at all. You still need to crank it to get better sounds. Ive got a Carvin 16 watt tube amp with a 5 watt switch and it will definetly wake the neighbors even on 5 watt mode. Try line 6 stuff for the apartment.
Comment
-
i AM spoiled, as i can and do use a 100 watt amp in my apartment and it is not a big deal (i now live in a garage apartment, which is kinda like a 1 bedroom house in the sky). BUT, i will say that playing at home with my rivera M100 is MUCH easier to get a decent tone at a reasonable volume compared to my fender tremolux, which is 35 watts. i need to get some SERIOUS volume on that amp in order to get a pleasing sound.
maybe it is BECAUSE the fender is a "clean only" amp. in order to get that full-bodied clean, i find myself putting the channel volume around 6. i sort of have the same issue with the rivera when i am playing clean. it is NOT as bad because there is a master volume.
i would tend to agree with some of the others. IF volume is a serious issue, a tube amp, even at 15 watts is going to be very loud when turned up enough to get a pleasing clean sound. if you just want a sterile, distortion-less platform for your distortion box, just get a solid-state clean amp, or go line 6.GEAR:
some guitars...WITH STRINGS!!!! most of them have those sticks like on guitar hero....AWESOME!!!!
some amps...they have some glowing bottle like things in them...i think my amps do that modelling thing....COOL, huh?!?!?!
and finally....
i have those little plastic "chips" used to hit the strings...WHOA!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spivonious View PostAny tube amp is too loud for an apartment, unless you have understanding neighbors.My Duncan Designed pickups are way better than Seymour Duncan regular pickups you fanboy.
Yeah...too bad the forum doesn't have a minimum IQ.
Comment
-
I went through a year of looking for a low watt tube amp when my daughter was born, and I came to the conclusion that it was a worthless pursuit. I even went high end with it, Carr Mercury, Cornford Harlequin and Carrera, Dr Z stuff, and I gave up. It all sounded like crap, IMO. I went back to the 100 watt amp with master volume, and I'm very happy. My 100 watter dialed way way down sounds 10x better than any of the low watt tube amps.
Of course, you need to find a good hi watter with a great mastervolume, and these are pricey, though not much more so than the top of the line low watters.
If I were to do this on the cheap, I'd only be looking at the Fender Champ 600 or the Roland Solid State Cube line.
Comment
-
Originally posted by danastas View PostExcept by a good tube amp.
Seriously, my tube amp would kill any modeller and low watt tube amp at low volumes._________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken M
Comment
-
Originally posted by Axewielder View PostMaybe for cleans, but you'll never get the sound of a roaring, distorted stack at low volumes without a modeler.
I've gone modeling, solid state, tubes, low watt tubes, and in the end, my tube amp with a master volume does low volume best.
I recently sold my Axe-FX, I've had a Vetta, I've gone through low watt tubes, and I'm telling you, nothing comes close at low volumes to the sound of my CarolAnn 100 watter. And consider this, I'm playing through EV12Ls which will not break up under any circumstances, so it's all coming directly from the amp.
Comment
-
Originally posted by danastas View PostI've spent too much money on this search.
I've gone modeling, solid state, tubes, low watt tubes, and in the end, my tube amp with a master volume does low volume best.
I recently sold my Axe-FX, I've had a Vetta, I've gone through low watt tubes, and I'm telling you, nothing comes close at low volumes to the sound of my CarolAnn 100 watter. And consider this, I'm playing through EV12Ls which will not break up under any circumstances, so it's all coming directly from the amp._________________________________________________
"Artists should be free to spend their days mastering their craft so that working people can toil away in a more beautiful world."
- Ken M
Comment
-
The difference is the mastervolume's control over the stack as well as some measures the builder took.
There's a sparkle switch to adjust for treble cut with low volume.
There's also a mid boost.
And finally, the effects loop level can be adjusted to have maximal impact on output. When I go low volume, I turn the effects loop level down which allows me to send more juice to the tubes even as I'm dialing down volume.
If the effects level was kept at normal position (for me, at 50%) then the volume would need to be adjusted down even more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Axewielder View PostThat sounds like a trick setup. Was this a one-off build with features that you spec'd out?
He makes three version, a Texas setup for SRV types, the stock version that I have, and a very high gain set up he made for the ex-guitarist of Bad Brains. I can't imagine more gain though than I have on tap already. It's too much for me, and with my LP, it just sustains forever with great signing feedback.
Comment
Comment