Im sure it will be reliable. Carvin designs the gear to handle more than its capable of. Make sense??? If its a 100 watt amp then all the pieces and parts are designed to work at lets say 120 watts. They do this for reliability.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Carvin Mental Hystrionics!
Collapse
X
-
I had a '88 version with 6l6's. It sounded great for hard rock and early metal. The eq was very versatile. Is sounded especially good with a bbe stinger pedal."Yes,..that's when they used to shove a red hot spike in your peehole until you screamed "yes, yes, godammit ..you fuggin' dicks..I'm a witch..I am witch..you cocksuckers"" horns666
Comment
-
A buddy of mine in the 80's played an X220 Koa through an X100B amp with a matching Carvin 4x12 (he bought them new at the same time in '84) and juiced it with a Boss DS-1 (he also had a board full of Boss effects). He had one of the best tones that I've heard to this day for classic metal.
The biggest knock on newer Carvin gear is component quality...my amp tech said they use some of the cheapest garbage that he has ever seen in an amp and that the wiring is poorly done. This was in reference to a Legacy head.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rupe View PostThe biggest knock on newer Carvin gear is component quality...my amp tech said they use some of the cheapest garbage that he has ever seen in an amp and that the wiring is poorly done. This was in reference to a Legacy head.
but in these days of every company going for anything on the cheap they can get away with, I would not be too surprised with just about any revelation about quality or lack thereof.
at least they are made here in the USA. and I've been nothing but pleased with the Carvin V3 head I got a few months back. I know nothing about the guts but it's real poplar plywood construction and built heavy duty. so far so good.the guitar players look damaged - they've been outcasts all their lives
Comment
-
The Legacy has gone through several phases of quality through its production. Read some of the reviews at H-C for funny stories (well, I don't own a Legacy so I think they're funny) of the time period where Legacies would randomly catch fire.please don't put it into words, 'cause I fear what you're thinking
Comment
-
-
Well, after all the great support from all of you, guess what.
My mind has been changed.
Son #1 noted I'm already attenuating my 22 watt amp, why would I need something that's 10 times as loud? And son number 2 is ready (has earned), through a lot of great work, a new laptop to replace his old one. So, drumroll...
I decided I'm going to build what I want. I have so many unused amp parts laying around, and like doing it, so I might as well make my own tone monster.
How does four 6550's sound? Overdriven? Like 200 watts, for only about 200 dollars worth of parts. I already have the transformers, sockets, and many of the board components. Seriously, I'll probably just stick with a 6V6 dual, with switches for 6L6, KT88, etc. I love the way the 6V6 sings. More hystrionics...but the family gets the riches. And I get to play with another project.
BTW, fett's amp came out great.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hippietim View PostI used to get guys come up to me at shows asking me where my rack was.
As for the Carvin, I have an MTS head that I'm warming up to slowly, now that it's set up for EL34's. I would love to hear what the new X100B sounds like.
Comment
-
I just got done ordering transformers and some oddball things I don't have from Weber.
Grand total, 178.00, which includes enough to rebuild the Deluxe Reverb.
I'll have enough supplies to build just about anything I want.
I, uh, understand there probably aren't very many amp builders here, but I'm thinking
of a gain drenched 6V6 setup, one channel, no reverb, with a standard Marshall tone stack. Push Pull, based on the Deluxe 5E3. Very basic, but with a gain stage or two.
Maybe one to push a preamp, and another one to push the power tubes. 5Y3 rectified.
(I wonder if I should go with a diode rectifier?)...Anyways, the PT is designed for anything from a 5V4 to a 5Y3, or a 5U4GB. Depends on what I want to design.
Comment
-
I'm thinking of a gain drenched 6V6 setup
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cygnus X1 View PostI, uh, understand there probably aren't very many amp builders here, but I'm thinking of a gain drenched 6V6 setup, one channel, no reverb, with a standard Marshall tone stack.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rupe View PostThat can work but you have to carefully voice it for minimal lows as 6V6's tend get "flubby" in the bottom end at volume. When I gig with my old Deluxe Reverb, I run the bass on 3 and it can still get loose on me. High gain will just make things worse. A vintage Marshall tone stack may work as they tended to have weak lows while really pushing the upper mids.
(At least on the AA763 and AB763 true blackfaces).
I put a 5U4 GB in it, and it tightened up the bass/mid bass at lower volumes.
It's difficult to get a good GZ34, but I have a very old Telefunken I keep stashed. It sounds good at high volume on this amp. A lot of GZ34's are rebranded 5Y3's, which are flubbly for the 22 watts. Mucho-saggio.
As for SS recto, if I were to go that route, I'd probably go with a 6L6 setup...
The 6V6 is picky around the SS recto's. Something about spikes.
Funny, I hijacked my own thread.
Comment
Comment