Originally posted by veemagic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Warren and Robbin - who is Left and who is Right?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by straycat View PostWhats the point? Why argue about it this isn't the My Les Paul forum.
Oh God I hope this place doesn't start getting like that shit hole of a forum.This is what I think of Gibson since 1993. I HATE BEING LEFT HANDED! I rock out to Baby metal because Wilkinsi said I can't listen to Rick Astley anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by leftykingv2 View Post+1 And I hope Jackson's don't start sounding, playing and costing like the new Gibson's do."I have so much gayness at times. My wife walks in my music room, and there I am, in my undies, listening to "Sister Christian" while lighting fireworks..doin' blow." - Bill Z
"I leave off the back plate and pinch my forskin between the tension springs. That may not work for everyone. But I find that the people love it. Half the tone is in the pud." - Bill Z
Comment
-
Originally posted by veemagic View PostSeriously? Again?Last edited by leftykingv2; 12-21-2013, 11:06 AM.This is what I think of Gibson since 1993. I HATE BEING LEFT HANDED! I rock out to Baby metal because Wilkinsi said I can't listen to Rick Astley anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by leftykingv2 View PostI called that shit from jump street!! I knew you were an engineer because you write like my buddy Chris Lorre talks and he's one of the best engineers in Pittsburgh.
Originally posted by javert View PostI keep telling myself to stay out of these discussion, but I can't help myself Anyways, Devotee is correct. You can, in principle, get as accurate a description of a continuous signal as you'd like (or are willing to pay for) with a digital representation. It is mathematical fact. The practical limitations are basically due to the analog hardware involved in A/D or D/A conversion. However, you can of course do bad digital hardware just as you can do bad analog hardware, so one piece of digital hardware may sound poorly compared to your favorite analog unit (just think Behringer). Anyways, the basic question in relation to sampling and quantization is at how high a frequency you need to sample and how many bits you need to use per sample. That's it. On that matter, I would like to point the curious this paper http://drewdaniels.com/audible.pdf. In the paper, they basically demonstrate that the higher sampling frequencies and word lengths of super audio CD and DVD audio are a waste of ressources compared to regular CDs. People cannot hear the difference in blind tests. The reason that people hear differences in SACDs and regular CDs is that the material has been altered, for example remastered. Also, as I've pointed out in other threads on similar matters, there are auditive equivalents of the placebo effect, so you can get fooled into thinking your hear differences where there are none.
/Mads (full professor in audio processing)It's all about the blues-rock chatter.
Originally posted by RD...so now I have this massive empty house with my Harley, Guns, Guitar and nothing else...
Comment
-
Originally posted by FloydRose4Prez View PostHow about we go back to Warren and Robbin instead of arguing analog tape vs CD?This is what I think of Gibson since 1993. I HATE BEING LEFT HANDED! I rock out to Baby metal because Wilkinsi said I can't listen to Rick Astley anymore.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CowboyFromHell View PostMaybe not but you can't kill those things!This is what I think of Gibson since 1993. I HATE BEING LEFT HANDED! I rock out to Baby metal because Wilkinsi said I can't listen to Rick Astley anymore.
Comment
Comment