super bowl stones.

[Shawn Lutz]

Re: super bowl stones.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They had it going on in the late 60's and 70's they were past their prime in 82 when I saw em....

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Shawn, Was that at the Cotton Bowl in 82?

[/ QUOTE ]


Nope [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I didn't live in Texas then. I saw em at the Pontiac Silverdoom outside of Detroit. Iggy Pop and Carlos Santana opened up....after Carlos played there was really no reason for the Stones to play [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[MBreinin]

Re: super bowl stones.

I was impressed with Mick's energy, and equally impressed that two guitar player with over 100 years of combined experience could sound so much like a 13 year old newbie with a Peavey Bandit in his bedroom.

Worst guitar tones in the history of man, period.

Mike

[followthereaper]

Re: super bowl stones.

I was impressed that Mick looked younger than he did when I saw him on the news back when their tour first started last year. I'm also now convinced those accusations of him being gay or bi are true after watching him perform for obvious reasons.

[VitaminG]

Re: super bowl stones.

my favourite part of the Stones performance was in a pre-game interview with Mick. When the interviewer asked him if playing the halftime show at the Superbowl was something he'd always wanted to do, Jagger just replied "No".
[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Because of course, playing the schlocky Superbowl halftime show is the pinnacle of any musician's career. No one picks up an intrument for the fun of it, the fame, the money, the pussy, the satisfaction of contributing to the creative process. It's because one day they may get to stand in the middle of a paddock and try to entertain the punters for 12 minutes while the players are off-field, eating segmented oranges and making Gatorade commercials. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]