charvel body?

[rps14a]

stated to be a san dimas body, im not the best at identification, any opinions?

[Manyaxes]

Re: charvel body?


Chris states it's "suspected to be" not "it is" a Charvel product.

[rps14a]

Re: charvel body?

sorry i didnt word that right, anybody able to verify/shoot it down?

[Zerberus]

Re: charvel body?

The finish in the neck pocket bothers me....also, I can´t see anything that might be markings there, but I´d need a better pic...and somthing about the forearm contour bothers me as well, but could also be the pic.....

[83SanDimas]

Re: charvel body?

Not

[rps14a]

Re: charvel body?

[ QUOTE ]
Not

[/ QUOTE ]

any reson why?

[Chuckracer]

Re: charvel body?

Cause there's nothing to prove that it is, therefore it isn't and should not be sold with any percieved connection and related price tag.

[StukaJU87]

Re: charvel body?

[ QUOTE ]
Cause there's nothing to prove that it is, therefore it isn't and should not be sold with any percieved connection and related price tag.

[/ QUOTE ] Well said.

[Manyaxes]

Re: charvel body?

That also used to be my guitar when it was together and it was UNBELEIVEBLY heavy! I think 13 or 14 pounds! Never had any thoughts that it was a Charvel...I was kinda shocked Chris wrote that in the description, we never had that notion before. [img]/images/graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img]

[83SanDimas]

Re: charvel body?

Not....

The short answer is the shape is wrong..