If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
she plays fantastic...with the exception of a raised 16th fret (happens a lot up there with bolt-ons) she plays really really well.
i love how resonant and LIGHT the body is...and it's maple! i still can't get over that part.
taking it to a live show tonight, so it will be baptism by fire. but i think she'll do real well!
i REALLY wish FMIC would be more open about supporting the older guitars, such as at least giving us the log info....i mean, at this point i am really interested in trying out the new ones, and possibly buying one. but they need to support the older guitars too...
<font color="aqua">That sure is a beauty bob as I love the gold with the matching headstock. I have a question for the Charvel enthusiasts about the date of it though, if you look at the pattern of the holes for the trem plate, wouldn't this make it between an 82-83 Charvel body?
Budman, I think if you will ckeck a pic of the front of the guitar, you will notice that it has the tell-tale "swiming pool" route of a kalher conversion. Therefore, that rear route, together with any "holes" for the cover, is after market. May have been a pro job, but after market nontheless.
"I''ll say what I'm gonna say, cuz I'm going to Hell anyway!"
[ QUOTE ]
Budman, I think if you will ckeck a pic of the front of the guitar, you will notice that it has the tell-tale "swiming pool" route of a kalher conversion. Therefore, that rear route, together with any "holes" for the cover, is after market. May have been a pro job, but after market nontheless.
[/ QUOTE ]
<font color="aqua">ah, yes, good point bro- [img]/images/graemlins/toast.gif[/img] </font>
Comment