If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
that one is hard usually the charvel ones had a longer contour on the back extending past the trem route & the forearm contour extends past center, yours doesnt, but most of the imports were not 2 peice center joined. hopefully Kev 83SD will take a look hes really good with these things.
Dimarzios get confusing, I have seen late issue ones like the one Mushcup built up that are not San Dimas but very close with the exception of the bevel. I want to get one so I can ID it better. I have seen Charvels with short bevels but they are rare and usually in the later years. If you have a picture of the back of the body vertical it would help
was this the Charvel Parts Guitar Tim Rose was selling a few years back? Are you under the impression this is a Charvel parts guitar or are you only curious about the body?
[ QUOTE ]
Kinda reminds me of the old Dean Markley ad Charvel!!
[/ QUOTE ]
Yep, almost! Except for the maple board and the fender input jack (minor or major details depending on how you look at it! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]). I'm pretty close to finishing her up. I got vintage + NOS brass parts from all over the effin place. Gotta get rid of that Duncan LiveWire neck pickup though...can't picture myself taking the strings + pickguard off to change the batteries...EVER!
I am pretty sure this is a later Dimarzio because of the comfort bevel. In person I could tell. I would need to see a real sqaure shot (straight on) of the back, no angle to it to check the lines. The slight angle throws it off a bit but based on what I see it is later than an SD
Comment