If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Wow. That sure is...uniqe. Even if it was a Tele reversed headstock it would still rate on my personal cool-o-meter, but that poor tele head is preggers!
He´s a Dealer himself IIRC, he almost certainly snagged it directly at the Trade show (Musikmesse) in Frankfurt a few weeks back [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
I'm in Portsmouth, England and I was offered the Guitar by my Jackson Rep. I always get the list of available Guitars to the UK pretty early as he knows about my Charvel/Jackson addiction. I basically had the opportunity to aquire #001 before the show so I jumped at the chance. Unfortunately, I didn't get any photo's so I had no idea about the Headstock. I was hoping that it would be a Pointy. Even so, I'm slowly getting used to it!!!!
I may be the only one, but I don't mind that headstock shape. With the vintage brass tremolo I think it will have a better function (straight string pull). Call me a pervert [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] but I think I would order a Charvel with that head (though non reverse) instead of the pointy head and use a Schaller vintage tremolo (which has the same measures as a Floyd) with locking tuners.
[ QUOTE ]
When I saw the thread I went oh yeah !!!!!
When I saw the guitar I went Oh No !!!!!
Sorry , but that just looks wrong and dare I say it cheap . It looks like someone put a lefty Fender Telecaster neck on that body .
I wish I could be positive here , but I would not buy that .
Comment