These pile-ons dont really do anything other than make the poster feel better, I guess. If you really want something handled, there are more efficient ways to get this fixed. A very well worded phone call in a consistent and annoying manner is the best way to get a problem fixed.
I am neither defending nor accusing the Charvel people as a whole, but I own about 14 "newer" Charvels . My Dweezil was a train wreck, and I have a new PC1 at JCMI for a couple of months or so for a broken truss rod that I know damn well came that way when it was new.
The Dweezil I had addressed locally, because it wasnt worth my time to send it back across the continent.
Clearly, the finishing work on the Dweezils was piss-poor. Anyone denying that is just flat out playing games. And apparently there were similar issues with the Charvel Central run. But the others I own are absolutely perfect. Not a screw out of place or an overspray or squat. AND , they all came to me setup great, So I dont buy the whole "bad setups caused by shipping" crap.
I absolutely do think that the turnaround time on these "out of the box" failures is way too long. Some of us have a bunch of other things to play and keep us busy while we wait. But imagine the dude that saves up and shells out 2k for a guitar, his first CS, killer, USA axe, only to have issues and have to wait multiple months to get it back and enjoy it. Thats BS.
We all know that Charvel is pumping out guitars, but there should be some sort of immediate accomodation for these return trip guitars. I sent an Ernie Ball EVh that was owned by three people before me to them, and had it back in 7 days. Are they as big as FCMI? No. But its all relative, as they probably have 1/40th the staff as well.
Its about the fine details. The other thing that totally perplexes me is this, I have NEVER received a CS or Masterbuilt Fender that wasnt a champ and totally complete from setup to paperwork to paint. Isnt this the same entity, or is this just a Charvel problem?
Shawn
I am neither defending nor accusing the Charvel people as a whole, but I own about 14 "newer" Charvels . My Dweezil was a train wreck, and I have a new PC1 at JCMI for a couple of months or so for a broken truss rod that I know damn well came that way when it was new.
The Dweezil I had addressed locally, because it wasnt worth my time to send it back across the continent.
Clearly, the finishing work on the Dweezils was piss-poor. Anyone denying that is just flat out playing games. And apparently there were similar issues with the Charvel Central run. But the others I own are absolutely perfect. Not a screw out of place or an overspray or squat. AND , they all came to me setup great, So I dont buy the whole "bad setups caused by shipping" crap.
I absolutely do think that the turnaround time on these "out of the box" failures is way too long. Some of us have a bunch of other things to play and keep us busy while we wait. But imagine the dude that saves up and shells out 2k for a guitar, his first CS, killer, USA axe, only to have issues and have to wait multiple months to get it back and enjoy it. Thats BS.
We all know that Charvel is pumping out guitars, but there should be some sort of immediate accomodation for these return trip guitars. I sent an Ernie Ball EVh that was owned by three people before me to them, and had it back in 7 days. Are they as big as FCMI? No. But its all relative, as they probably have 1/40th the staff as well.
Its about the fine details. The other thing that totally perplexes me is this, I have NEVER received a CS or Masterbuilt Fender that wasnt a champ and totally complete from setup to paperwork to paint. Isnt this the same entity, or is this just a Charvel problem?
Shawn
Comment