Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

my first US Charvel .. #6014

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Peter:

    Many thanks -- the Jackson I was comparing my Charvel to was the oil-necked WR-1 it replaced. The Warrior had a super thin, super wide, super flat neck that made it feel like piece of precision lab equipment, like a perfectly calibrated analytical balance. Cold, precise, even. No dead spots, but no "live" ones either.

    It's amazing that you found the Jackson necks more round ... I guess the Warrior neck really was thinner than the others. Heh.

    Congrats on a great guitar. Bullseyes are Beautiful!

    --jr
    「久しぶりに絶望してえよ。マジで。」

    Comment


    • #17
      Johnny,

      The recessed part I'm referring to is actually the cover plate that goes over the springs. On the original line those were not recessed they actually sat ON the body. When I spec'd the bullseye run it never clicked with me that they would end up being recessed..bad assumption on my part ..
      Don't worry - I'll smack her if it comes to that. You do not sell guitars to buy shoes. You skimp on food to buy shoes! ~Mrs Tekky 06-03-08~

      Comment


      • #18
        The new Charvel trem cavity covers are recessed Kev!!

        Re: the new pointy neck profile,it is identical(imo)to what seems to be the most common eighties pointy neck profiles(there was some variation though not as much as the strathead profiles)!!

        Comment


        • #19
          Nice grab, I have stupidly passed on three of these mostly cuz of bad timing. Necks are great if you like the thinner profile.

          And Kev, for what it is worth, I dont think the non-recessed trem plate is all its cracked up to be - I actually prefer recessed.
          "I''ll say what I'm gonna say, cuz I'm going to Hell anyway!"

          Comment


          • #20
            These bullseyes are very cool........but I've always thought that the black rings of the bullseye needed to extend closer to the edge of the body.

            Maybe its just me.....or maybe I'm used to seeing the bullseye on a darker color background (usually red or black). Really great guitars though.
            Last edited by bsteff666; 06-01-2006, 11:06 PM.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by bsteff666
              These bullseyes are very cool........but I've always thought that the black rings of the bullseye needed to extend closer to the edge of the body.
              Funny, i always liked that particular detail. I find that it resembles a white body binding and help "frame" the graphic. We're all different i guess
              Henrik
              AUDIOZONE.DK - a guitar site for the Jackson and Charvel fan

              Comment


              • #22
                was one of the best days of my life when i got 6012. great guitar. Gunna change the pickup one of these days to a SH 14. Just too lazy at the moment

                Comment


                • #23
                  I have yet to own one of these but I will grab one when it comes accross my path. Of all the Charvels reissues, old and new, these get the best reviews. I have never heard a complaint and even the guys who sell them miss them. Older collectors and new say this one hit the bullseye dead center and captured the hot rod charvel mojo. Some left over magic I guess.


                  Congrats and enjoy!
                  It's not a competition, it's a community

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Nice grab. Everytime one of these changes hands I kick myself for not grabbing the ones that were offered to me (just bad timing). Those rock for what they are and play real nice too! Enjoy her.
                    "I''ll say what I'm gonna say, cuz I'm going to Hell anyway!"

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X