I just visited the local Guitar Center and tried a new US built Charvel pointy. Nearly every post I've read here says that the new Charvels absolutely nail the feel and neck dimensions from the originals. The neck on the G.C. one really disappointed me, so now I'm confused.
I know exactly what an 80s Jackson bolt-on neck feels like: wide, thin, flat, raw, and comfy. Every one I've tried has been pretty consistent, and I like 'em. I only have intimate knowledge of one original San Dimas neck--my strathead--which is quite different from the Jacksons. Out of a dozen high quality U.S. built shred guitars, the strathead is the most inviting and easiest playing guitar I own.
To be fair, since it was G.C., the new Charvel was poorly set up and abused. That said, the neck seemed skinny and sterile--sorta what I associate with Anderson guitars.
Not trying to stir anything up, but I'm genuinely puzzled. Is my killer strathead an abberation? Do I have a gross misconception of what a San Dimas Charvel should feel like?
I know exactly what an 80s Jackson bolt-on neck feels like: wide, thin, flat, raw, and comfy. Every one I've tried has been pretty consistent, and I like 'em. I only have intimate knowledge of one original San Dimas neck--my strathead--which is quite different from the Jacksons. Out of a dozen high quality U.S. built shred guitars, the strathead is the most inviting and easiest playing guitar I own.
To be fair, since it was G.C., the new Charvel was poorly set up and abused. That said, the neck seemed skinny and sterile--sorta what I associate with Anderson guitars.
Not trying to stir anything up, but I'm genuinely puzzled. Is my killer strathead an abberation? Do I have a gross misconception of what a San Dimas Charvel should feel like?
Comment