Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2009 Charvel USA Production Guitars

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shreddermon
    replied
    Newc, that's just goofy. The Jackson line had the pointyhead exclusively for so long only because the Charvel line was pretty much dead during those many years. Jackson pretty much had everything exclusively.

    There were thousands more SD Charvels made with pointy headstocks than with stratheads. That's largely why stratheads were so desireable - they were rare.

    The pointyhead is not just a "Jackson thing". It's a Jackson / Charvel thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Newc
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert Hendrix View Post
    I don't really agree with that. I remember Charvel being just as recognized for pointies as Jackson was.
    Prior to 1986, yeah. Oz Fox had a Custom Explorer/Star thing with a Charvel logo.

    After that, it was all Jackson; The other Stryper axes, Vai's Soloist, Beck's Soloists, everyone who had a Concert bass, etc.

    Charvel still had the Model imports with the pointyhead, but this line was resurrected with the understanding that Charvel=Strathead. The change to the pointyhead back in the 80s was due more to the Fender trademark issue than "hey we've got our own cool head design, let's use that".

    Leave a comment:


  • dimobag
    replied
    Star body with recessed Floyd Rose!
    And white as color option.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert Hendrix
    replied
    Originally posted by Newc View Post
    And I really hope they don't do pointyheads. The pointyhead is a Jackson thing and should remain a Jackson thing, there's no need to walk down the same road Charvel did in the 80s and end up dead again.
    I don't really agree with that. I remember Charvel being just as recognized for pointies as Jackson was.

    Leave a comment:


  • Newc
    replied
    You guys are forgetting that changes like pickup quantities and figured tops and bridge changes affect the price. That means there's little to no chance of them happening.

    And I really hope they don't do pointyheads. The pointyhead is a Jackson thing and should remain a Jackson thing, there's no need to walk down the same road Charvel did in the 80s and end up dead again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chubtone
    replied
    Originally posted by DHardmanJr View Post
    I tend to disagree with the "use classic Charvel colors" sentiment. If the production series is only intended to satisfy the cravings of those of us looking to recapture the classic Charvel, then yeah - go ahead and use the classic Charvel colors. But if the intent of Charvel with the production series is to find a new set of customers I think the more modern colors like they have been using make more sense.
    Great point.

    Leave a comment:


  • KBRR
    replied
    Im praying for a single hum SD1 from charvel at namm.. though i doubt it.

    Leave a comment:


  • gitfiddler
    replied
    Let's see a lochness green, shocking pink, and/or robin's egg blue (all with maple board)!

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert Hendrix
    replied
    I wouldn't mind seeing some natural or trans colors, as long as it's quilted.. never really likes the flame tops much. Pearl colors would be nice too.... Pearl white...... yeah!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Rich#6
    replied
    Guess we'll see what comes out at NAMM.
    White won't be the So-Cal because it would be too close to one of the potential CS guitars (due to the pickguard).
    If he says that no color is safe then no color is Safe.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bryan
    replied
    I happen to dig all the custom colors. So keep it up. I have to give Green as my top spot and Tangerine as a close second.

    Now isn't it about time for the next round of colors to be announced????

    Leave a comment:


  • joelayres
    replied
    Originally posted by Bionic View Post
    Sorry, I have to jump in. Not true. Interesting speculation. I WILL say that NO color is safe!!!

    Thanks for playing!

    -Mike
    Guess we'll see what comes out at NAMM.
    White won't be the So-Cal because it would be too close to one of the potential CS guitars (due to the pickguard).

    Leave a comment:


  • DHardmanJr
    replied
    I tend to disagree with the "use classic Charvel colors" sentiment. If the production series is only intended to satisfy the cravings of those of us looking to recapture the classic Charvel, then yeah - go ahead and use the classic Charvel colors. But if the intent of Charvel with the production series is to find a new set of customers I think the more modern colors like they have been using make more sense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Grandturk
    replied
    Originally posted by Chubtone View Post
    Tmy suggestion would be to paint these Charvels using Charvel colors. .
    I agree. While I like candy colors in general, they don't feel "Charvel" to me. I was expecting more sporty colors - Ferrari red, banana yellow, etc - colors that jump. Now, that said, I don't need to see pinks, flourescents and powder type colors.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chubtone
    replied
    To Mike and other Charvel guys reading this: my suggestion would be to paint these Charvels using Charvel colors. Typical, old school Charvel colors. Some of these colors so far have looked very similar to current Jackson import colors and while they have been cool guitars, demand would be through the roof if the colors were as reminiscent of old school Charvels as everything else about the guitars is.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X