Hi, I'm new here. I'm also new to Charvel ownership, but not to guitars. I've played for over 25 years, and have owned many guitars from many different companies in that time.
Recent band developments led me on a search for a new axe, and I discovered the production model Charvels. I'm fortunate to live a mile away from a high end guitar store that is a Charvel dealer, and had the opportunity to try several of the pro models as well as several custom shop guitars.
The CS guitars were awesome, but honestly, I can't ever see taking a $2500 + guitar onstage. I own several guitars in that price range, and they stay in my studio. Besides the pagan gold So-Cal I ended up buying performs as well or better than many pricier guitars I've played recently. Things like 'tone' or playability are completely subjective, but this is one of the best guitars I've ever owened, and I actually prefer it to the CS guitars I tried out. That's not a bash on the CS, it was just my personal experience.
I don't want to offend anyone here, but the arguments that I keep reading in regards to these being "real" Charvels or not seem a little silly to me. The argument that they're really Fenders... Well I just don't buy that. I've owned several Fenders over the years, including a heavy metal strat, and I've never played a Fender that felt like the So-Cal. Besides didn't Charvel originally customize Fenders? Thus the whole "hot rod strat" thing? (I could be wrong on this stuff, I'm not a Charvel historian or anything. )
FMIC also owns Jackson, Guild, EVH, and Gretch. Are they all those guitars "Fenders" too?
I just don't personally understand the idea that a guitar isn't valid if it didn't start it's life in a custom shop. Most large guitar companies have a custom shop these days, but they also have producion models. I don't think most people consider a Fender American standard strat any less a fender than its custom shop brethren.
I could understand some harsh opinions if the pro models sucked, or if the quality was bad, but that doesn't seem to be the general consensus. And so what if a company only made expensive custom guitars in the past? Companies often change... In many cases they have to to survive.
Anyway, I'm not trying to offend anyone, these are just my opinions. I'm REALLY happy to own my So-Cal, and frankly I don't care what company built it, I would have bought it regardless of the brand... It's a great guitar.
I will say this though, I'm feeling pretty converted to the Charvel camp, and will probably buy more in the future... Maybe even a sweet expensive custom shop creation, so maybe it's a good thing the pro mods are out there... 'Cause I might not have really discovered the brand without them.
Recent band developments led me on a search for a new axe, and I discovered the production model Charvels. I'm fortunate to live a mile away from a high end guitar store that is a Charvel dealer, and had the opportunity to try several of the pro models as well as several custom shop guitars.
The CS guitars were awesome, but honestly, I can't ever see taking a $2500 + guitar onstage. I own several guitars in that price range, and they stay in my studio. Besides the pagan gold So-Cal I ended up buying performs as well or better than many pricier guitars I've played recently. Things like 'tone' or playability are completely subjective, but this is one of the best guitars I've ever owened, and I actually prefer it to the CS guitars I tried out. That's not a bash on the CS, it was just my personal experience.
I don't want to offend anyone here, but the arguments that I keep reading in regards to these being "real" Charvels or not seem a little silly to me. The argument that they're really Fenders... Well I just don't buy that. I've owned several Fenders over the years, including a heavy metal strat, and I've never played a Fender that felt like the So-Cal. Besides didn't Charvel originally customize Fenders? Thus the whole "hot rod strat" thing? (I could be wrong on this stuff, I'm not a Charvel historian or anything. )
FMIC also owns Jackson, Guild, EVH, and Gretch. Are they all those guitars "Fenders" too?
I just don't personally understand the idea that a guitar isn't valid if it didn't start it's life in a custom shop. Most large guitar companies have a custom shop these days, but they also have producion models. I don't think most people consider a Fender American standard strat any less a fender than its custom shop brethren.
I could understand some harsh opinions if the pro models sucked, or if the quality was bad, but that doesn't seem to be the general consensus. And so what if a company only made expensive custom guitars in the past? Companies often change... In many cases they have to to survive.
Anyway, I'm not trying to offend anyone, these are just my opinions. I'm REALLY happy to own my So-Cal, and frankly I don't care what company built it, I would have bought it regardless of the brand... It's a great guitar.
I will say this though, I'm feeling pretty converted to the Charvel camp, and will probably buy more in the future... Maybe even a sweet expensive custom shop creation, so maybe it's a good thing the pro mods are out there... 'Cause I might not have really discovered the brand without them.
Comment