Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

why not a fusion?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • why not a fusion?

    I'm sorry I don't show up here often but I have wanted jackson to do something like the fusion again. Bailey Brothers Music just kind of laughed off my idea when their Jackson rep was in.Needless to say I felt pretty small in theirs and Jacksons eyes when I asked if the fusion scale was under any consideration.
    I used to play dinky reverses religiosly but my hands and wrist started to cramp and hurt like nobodies buisness and so I tried a Fusion HH and it all came back to me. I don't know why but it was like finding a part of my playing that had been missing for a long time. I now play a white fusion XL with ebony board and no address on the plate.
    I really don't want to go ebay to buy guitars. I would like to buy a new one.
    Is there really no hope of seeing a 24 3/4 inch scale from Jackson again, like the fusions or 750 XL's?
    An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
    A tooth for a tooth means we all eat through a straw.

  • #2
    Re: why not a fusion?

    The fusions are discontinued since many years ago. Maybe hou'll have the luck to find one (maybe on new old stock) in a store. You can also get one from the custom shop, the custom shop still offers the fusion scale.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: why not a fusion?

      I love my Fusion!! [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: why not a fusion?

        Or maybe get one of the Jackson Swee-Tone models... they're 25" scale like Carvin and PRS. I really dig the 25" scale on my Carvins, whether tuned to standard or a half-step flat. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
        I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: why not a fusion?

          Make it 3 for 3 on this thread - I love my fusion too. Best playing guitar I own.
          Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam!

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: why not a fusion?

            I guess that I'm not crazy then. Ore maybe this means I have found others as crazy as myself [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]
            An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
            A tooth for a tooth means we all eat through a straw.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: why not a fusion?

              I like my Fusion too! I don't know why they laughed at your question though [img]graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img] ...Perhaps they just didn't have an intelligent answer. I wonder what my XTRR would be like in that scale? [img]graemlins/idea2.gif[/img]
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6M4lm9Ahz0

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: why not a fusion?

                fusions rock. my hh is the most bad a$$ guitar to play. can't wait to find more.

                Garry [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: why not a fusion?

                  i love my XL. everything is so easy to reach. and i bought it from the original Odorus of GWAR!
                  Widow - "We have songs"

                  http://jameslugo.com/johnewooteniv.shtml

                  http://ultimateguitarsound.com

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: why not a fusion?

                    Those Fusions are sweet! I´ll probably be picking one up next.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X