Hi everybody,
I am new to forum and I am into 80s era hard rock, glam, old school metal. Here I would like to ask a few questions that puzzles me.
I used to own a Les Paul for long years and I know what to expect and not to expect from Les Pauls. After many years playing with Les Paul I tried a USA Production Model San Dimas Style 1 (Alder body, bolt-on one piece maple neck, 22 fret, JB-59 pickups, floyd rose) last year and was captivated by its snappy and responsive sound. Later I bought a used 91 Japanese made Charvel Custom ST (ash body, bolt on 22 frets maple neck, rosewood fingerboard, gotoh tremolo) and strangely I found its sound much useful than san dimas.
Custom ST has pool type cavity so I tried HSS and SSS configurations with it. And in all configurations I am getting better range of sounds than San Dimas and it has really DEFINITE, CLEAN, WARMER sound. Although I splitted the humbuckers of San Dimas it is miles away from the sound I get with Charvel Custom ST and it was for me the 1/3 price of San Dimas.
However they offer different worlds, the sound of Custom ST useful but neck of the San Dimas is unbelievable for me. It is very responsive : tapping, legatos everything is so easy but the sound is so bright or can get easily muddy (hard to control) and I am totally puzzled.
By the way I tried Alnico II in the neck of San Dimas and it was relatively better but needed this pickup for Les Paul. I tried lowering the pickups, adjusted pole pieces etc. etc.
My ultimate question is : Can I have both worlds in one guitar. I mean warm and useful sound of Custom ST (it can get easily bright too and I like the sound of singles when I need them) and super responsiveness of San Dimas ?
A few sub questions :
1- Is it ash and rosewood combination that makes Custom ST's sound useful ?
2- Is responsiveness of San Dimas is coming from build quality ? or Alder Maple combination ? or neck profile/one piece maple thing ? or everything together ?
3- Is floyd rose a parameter in this equation ?
4- Can I get similar attack and responsiveness of San Dimas with a rosewood fingerboard guitar (I am asking that because I see several discussions where people say fingerboard material doesn't affect that much where I totally disagree because I have my Les Paul with ebony fingerboard and I know how rosewood in Les Paul sounds).
Thanks for reading my extensive post and all kind of inputs are appreciated.
Cheers !
I am new to forum and I am into 80s era hard rock, glam, old school metal. Here I would like to ask a few questions that puzzles me.
I used to own a Les Paul for long years and I know what to expect and not to expect from Les Pauls. After many years playing with Les Paul I tried a USA Production Model San Dimas Style 1 (Alder body, bolt-on one piece maple neck, 22 fret, JB-59 pickups, floyd rose) last year and was captivated by its snappy and responsive sound. Later I bought a used 91 Japanese made Charvel Custom ST (ash body, bolt on 22 frets maple neck, rosewood fingerboard, gotoh tremolo) and strangely I found its sound much useful than san dimas.
Custom ST has pool type cavity so I tried HSS and SSS configurations with it. And in all configurations I am getting better range of sounds than San Dimas and it has really DEFINITE, CLEAN, WARMER sound. Although I splitted the humbuckers of San Dimas it is miles away from the sound I get with Charvel Custom ST and it was for me the 1/3 price of San Dimas.
However they offer different worlds, the sound of Custom ST useful but neck of the San Dimas is unbelievable for me. It is very responsive : tapping, legatos everything is so easy but the sound is so bright or can get easily muddy (hard to control) and I am totally puzzled.
By the way I tried Alnico II in the neck of San Dimas and it was relatively better but needed this pickup for Les Paul. I tried lowering the pickups, adjusted pole pieces etc. etc.
My ultimate question is : Can I have both worlds in one guitar. I mean warm and useful sound of Custom ST (it can get easily bright too and I like the sound of singles when I need them) and super responsiveness of San Dimas ?
A few sub questions :
1- Is it ash and rosewood combination that makes Custom ST's sound useful ?
2- Is responsiveness of San Dimas is coming from build quality ? or Alder Maple combination ? or neck profile/one piece maple thing ? or everything together ?
3- Is floyd rose a parameter in this equation ?
4- Can I get similar attack and responsiveness of San Dimas with a rosewood fingerboard guitar (I am asking that because I see several discussions where people say fingerboard material doesn't affect that much where I totally disagree because I have my Les Paul with ebony fingerboard and I know how rosewood in Les Paul sounds).
Thanks for reading my extensive post and all kind of inputs are appreciated.
Cheers !
Comment