Re: Jackson model designations to change?
I always thought the guitars were what they are...Soloist, Kelly, King V, Rhoads...and the letter/number combination defined the model further. When people ask what Jackson I have, I say a Soloist...I thought the SL-1, or SL-2, and SL-2H just defined the different model types...but I can understand how using the same letters and numbers, T for the string through model Rhoads, and the 2 meaning two different things can be confusing. I don't want any Fender names, though...and I think the imports deserve the Jackson name just as long as it's something to be proud of. I think ESP not putting their own name on their imports is kinda like "we almost don't want to take responsibility for these, or associate them with OUR ESP models..." but from what I hear, you guys seem to like the quality of Jackson imports, so even if I don't like imports, keep the Jackson name if it's worth the praise.
Cheers,
Nick
I always thought the guitars were what they are...Soloist, Kelly, King V, Rhoads...and the letter/number combination defined the model further. When people ask what Jackson I have, I say a Soloist...I thought the SL-1, or SL-2, and SL-2H just defined the different model types...but I can understand how using the same letters and numbers, T for the string through model Rhoads, and the 2 meaning two different things can be confusing. I don't want any Fender names, though...and I think the imports deserve the Jackson name just as long as it's something to be proud of. I think ESP not putting their own name on their imports is kinda like "we almost don't want to take responsibility for these, or associate them with OUR ESP models..." but from what I hear, you guys seem to like the quality of Jackson imports, so even if I don't like imports, keep the Jackson name if it's worth the praise.
Cheers,
Nick
Comment