Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

    Originally posted by Scholomance:
    Jesus. I have seen more broken guitars in the last few months than in the last couple years. This has mostly been by UPS, but USPS joins in. I have been told by local shippers who actually give a crap about keeping my business that you should NEVER put 'fragile' or 'breakable' on the box of anything of value, particularly large, heavy boxes. Some of these fucking retards use that as a challenge to break your stuff on purpose because they don't want to take the time to lift/move the boxes carefully. Sometimes these guys will just take the guitar boxes and let them drop straight head or bottom first off loading docks. That's how the necks can get so easily broken. Where they give it to you in the ass is if it does get broken, they can say "well, it didn't say it was 'fragile'."
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">AH! There's no way to win . . .

    *ehem, FEDEX*

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

      Hah,

      I just went in my kitchen, where there is a UPS package. the box is about 1' long and about 8" wide. One whole courner is completely ripped open and mashed in. . . [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

        Greg,
        oh no i will not let them repair the neck
        i'am going to get 2 invoices saying that the neck cannnot be repaired because of the crack running long ways down the neck

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

          wasn't it a neck thru guitar? how can you get another neck if it was a neck thru one? i'd be crying like a baby if that was my guitar, sorry man

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

            eddiewarlock
            nope it was a bolt on with the neck painted black from the factory work order on the heel of the guitar neck reversed shark tooth inlays (not upside down)
            with one of the first pearl jackson logos no made in the usa

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

              Originally posted by skarhead:
              when i'm reading this board i'm getting more and more scared of buying guitars online , i wanted to order my next guitar per net / buy it from someone at jcf ... when i read things about damaged guitars that were all covered in bubblewrap and/or bulletproof cases it makes me wonder ...
              <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">--------------------------------------------------
              I've been really lucky I guess, I've ordered 3 brand-new Jacksons online now (none of them were shipped to me in a case, just those standard brown guitar shipper boxes you always see in back of any GC), and all of them I received in perfect condition...After seeing those nightmare pics by the thread starter though, I am wondering how I got them without any damage to them at all [img]graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img] ......

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                KarmicApexIntellect,
                this is the first and last time i get one/or ship one thru the usps
                i waited all day sat. for my charvel strat head to get here from fed-ex and it showed up @ 5:30 in perfect condition

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                  Go in the post office and raise holy hell until someone rights you a check [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] . I'd be so pissed I'd end up in jail. I'm really sorry about the neck but glad you got the replacement. Good luck getting the money back!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                    Man, that is so fucking sad [img]images/icons/frown.gif[/img]


                    Sorry about your loss bro.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                      That sucks man. I am scared to send anything out now.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                        Those pics must be the worst I`ve ever seen, sorry bro. 3 weeks ago I recieved a Les paul and the case had a big hole in it. The guitar had a damage on the backside too. Still wondering how this turns out. There`s just a lot of phone calls and a complete waste of time [img]images/icons/mad.gif[/img]

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                          Originally posted by Scholomance:
                          This has mostly been by UPS, but USPS joins in. I have been told by local shippers who actually give a crap about keeping my business that you should NEVER put 'fragile' or 'breakable' on the box of anything of value, particularly large, heavy boxes.
                          <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What you said about intentional damage is probably true in some cases but there's another issue here as well: claims. FedEx's contract states that items marked "fragile" receive no special treatment so marking them as such will probably make it *harder* to collect on a claim (e.g., "Well, you *knew* it was fragile and therefore that it might not withstand shipping.", Etc.). With USPS on the other hand, whether or not you properly labeled the item "fragile" goes the other way: it seems to be a factor in your favor in collecting on a claim.
                          Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                            up !!

                            I have just received my RR custom shop with the headstock brocken into 2 pieces [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] (thanks UPS)
                            I hope that I will be refunded, but man... that sucks !!!

                            I don't have pics of this drama, but it was that one :



                            [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                              HOLY ****!

                              NO WAY! Your NAMM was delivered with the headstock broken?!!!

                              That's not just a guitar, that's a piece of frigging history gone to waste right there! Motherfuckers!
                              You took too much, man. Too much. Too much.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: new jackson neck/headstock design Pixs!!!!

                                That really sucks - sorry to hear about that. It was a really cool guitar which I had my eye on as well.....by reputation, I'm sure Matt will help you sort this out.
                                Just a thought: why does the onus always seem to fall to the addressee to follow this up? Surely the sender (store or individual) should pursue this as they are usually the one who has instigated the 'contract' with the parcels company.....
                                Popular is not the same as good
                                Rare is not the same as valuable
                                Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X