My friend just purchased this Jackson soloist 1987 and its in beautiful condition almost new.Whats odd is the color glows in the dark which is cool and I cant find any other photos of this model online of this color and 2 humbuckers.What is up with the glow in the dark is this some kind of custom shop guitar?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Can someone identify this New Jackson soloist Guitar from 1987
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Steve k View PostMy friend just purchased this Jackson soloist 1987 and its in beautiful condition almost new.Whats odd is the color glows in the dark which is cool and I cant find any other photos of this model online of this color and 2 humbuckers.What is up with the glow in the dark is this some kind of custom shop guitar?
There were no production models until later.
Comment
-
Originally posted by john.w.lawsonnever seen a toggle on an eighties soloist before, doesn't mean its not though. this is an 88 usa soloist
It is clearly a mid 80s (86-88 era).
But you are correct in the sense that HSS and 3 toggles were the norm
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steve k View Post.
Either way, they called it green. I assume because the glow was green.
It is clearly yellow during the day. Yours looks far less yellow, almost like an aged white /cream. The tag should say what color it is.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pianoguyy View Post
It is clearly a mid 80s (86-88 era).
But you are correct in the sense that HSS and 3 toggles were the normI know the old saying that the value of an opinion is generally inversely proportional to the strength with which it is held.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pianoguyy View Post
It is clearly a mid 80s (86-88 era).
But you are correct in the sense that HSS and 3 toggles were the norm
I know the old saying that the value of an opinion is generally inversely proportional to the strength with which it is held.
Comment
-
1987-onwards, at least from the Charvel Model Series perspective, would be "correct" for the JT6 trem.
Man, what a find!
It would just be called a Soloist Custom. This would contrast with a Soloist Student. For that era, "Custom" and "Student" denote the level of trim but had equivalent build quality.
Custom = ebony fretboard, MOP sharkfinlays, and bound neck/headstock.
Student = rosewood fretboard, MOP dot inlays, and unbound neck/headstock.
Of course, there was a lot of variation, because as the users above me established, everything American-made (before the introduction of the 1990 USA production models) was considered one-off, custom-made, and made-to-order. But your guitar easily fits into the Soloist Custom parameters.
Just don't go calling it an SL2H. The SL2H designation didn't exist until 2000 and denotes very specific specifications. One of my pet peeves is seeing users on Jackson-related Facebook groups calling a pre-1996 HSS Soloist as an "SL1" and a pre-2000 HH Soloist as "SL2H". It's even worse when those users actually owned 80s Jacksons and should have been aware of era-correct names!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Number Of The Priest View Post1987-onwards, at least from the Charvel Model Series perspective, would be "correct" for the JT6 trem.
Man, what a find!
It would just be called a Soloist Custom. This would contrast with a Soloist Student. For that era, "Custom" and "Student" denote the level of trim but had equivalent build quality.
Custom = ebony fretboard, MOP sharkfinlays, and bound neck/headstock.
Student = rosewood fretboard, MOP dot inlays, and unbound neck/headstock.
Of course, there was a lot of variation, because as the users above me established, everything American-made (before the introduction of the 1990 USA production models) was considered one-off, custom-made, and made-to-order. But your guitar easily fits into the Soloist Custom parameters.
Just don't go calling it an SL2H. The SL2H designation didn't exist until 2000 and denotes very specific specifications. One of my pet peeves is seeing users on Jackson-related Facebook groups calling a pre-1996 HSS Soloist as an "SL1" and a pre-2000 HH Soloist as "SL2H". It's even worse when those users actually owned 80s Jacksons and should have been aware of era-correct names!
this would be a SL2H select, just because of trans body and headstock. can't really see the flame in the pics but you can see my copperheads
Last edited by john.w.lawson; 04-02-2021, 12:35 AM.I know the old saying that the value of an opinion is generally inversely proportional to the strength with which it is held.
Comment
Comment