Is this f-ing sweet or what?

[Athlon]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

it looks completely ....... average

soz

[Dreamland_Rebel]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

...what.

[Shawn Lutz]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

I'll go with or what on that one [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[withmyshadow]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

I wish they could do a recess the TOM bridge like c@rvin's. the advantage is then TOM and standard string thru have the same height so neck doesn't have to be angled back a little and two pickups can be both flat with the body.

[shadowcat]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

IMO the bridge height and neck angle is the best thing about string-thru bridges. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

But for the guitar pictured above I would go with "or what" too... I'd take an original SLSMG over that (except for the pickups!)

[DumpyWumpy]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I thought it was cool.... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[catzodellamarina]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

Where's the generator? On Jackson's site? I seem to never find it.

[DK127]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

[ QUOTE ]
Where's the generator? On Jackson's site? I seem to never find it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Last time I used it was at the "resources".

[slevy007]

Re: Is this f-ing sweet or what?

Not bad, but I don't generally like string thru's.

slevy007