Gallery submissions

[sully]

Re: Gallery submissions

we have no plans on revamping the gallery. just adding to it.

[GodWentPUNK]

Re: Gallery submissions

[ QUOTE ]
we are looking at updating our software for the board

[/ QUOTE ]

NOt sure if it just me but the "search" engine is really bad. If I submit my search incorrectly I have to wait 5 minutes before submitting a new one

joe...

[Tekky]

Re: Gallery submissions

We're aware of the search function problems. This is one of the items we're hoping to correct with the software update.

[VitaminG]

Re: Gallery submissions

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of interest, are we going to be able to search the new gallery? Quite often ive just wanted pictures of a finish or graphic, and at present ive had to trawl through the lot just to find them (unless i missed something!).

[/ QUOTE ]

Just having good descriptions of each instrument would help. You can always do a text search in your browser, but if the specs aren't properly described, there isn't much to search.

[/ QUOTE ]

that is the responsibility of the person making the submission. I've always tried to provide a good description of any guitars I have in there, and the admins have always included the description with my pics. Some folks seem to just send a pic of the guitar with minimal information. It's not the admins' job to research the guitars submitted to the Gallery.

[sully]

Re: Gallery submissions

yep. when i was doing the gallery way back in the summer of'74, i'd copy and paste pretty much whatever description i got from the owner. the more detail (and pix) i got, the more that went in there.

sully

[StukaJU87]

Re: Gallery submissions

Sully, you had internet service in '74? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[diablomozart]

Re: Gallery submissions

yeah...him and al gore invented the net together way back then...lol...d.m.

[mm2002]

Re: Gallery submissions

[ QUOTE ]
Um ..it isn't going to be a "new" gallery ..nothing will change other than all admins will be able to access submissions

[/ QUOTE ]

OK Kev, what's up with the "Mayday" thing??? Maybe I just haven't noticed it until now, but I'm honored! Did you do that just because my birthday is May 1st? Man, I had no idea you looked up to me that much! Man, you know I love you too. [img]/images/graemlins/toast.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/notworthy.gif[/img]

[RacerX]

Re: Gallery submissions

"Mayday" Mark 2002 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]


Didn't know you were 4 years old there Marky! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[mm2002]

Re: Gallery submissions

Oh thanks a bunch Ronny!!! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[~K~]

Re: Gallery submissions

heh .. Mayday got coined by Atomic Tommy and it kind of stuck ..When I started machining some hard tails for Sully we etched them with a logo "Maydaypahts"

[ZZB]

Re: Gallery submissions

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of interest, are we going to be able to search the new gallery? Quite often ive just wanted pictures of a finish or graphic, and at present ive had to trawl through the lot just to find them (unless i missed something!).

[/ QUOTE ]

Just having good descriptions of each instrument would help. You can always do a text search in your browser, but if the specs aren't properly described, there isn't much to search.

[/ QUOTE ]

that is the responsibility of the person making the submission. I've always tried to provide a good description of any guitars I have in there, and the admins have always included the description with my pics. Some folks seem to just send a pic of the guitar with minimal information. It's not the admins' job to research the guitars submitted to the Gallery.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly. It might be a good idea the emphasize the importance of detailed descriptions. Just my two modest cents.