i know J/C cant do gibby shapes. how does hamer & dean get away with making them? especially since i think they are more comparable, same kinda of construction & woods. you cant confuse a jackson for a gibson but a hamer.....maybe.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
? about shapes
Collapse
X
-
I've heard part of it is a 'gentleman's agreement' between FMIC and Gibson which states that they won't copy each other's body styles (possibly due to abject failure and money wasted in each camp!)...Popular is not the same as good
Rare is not the same as valuable
Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get
-
No... PRS won it...Gibson lost...Cold Hollow Machinery
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjohnstone View PostGibson won the initial suit and then PRS won it on appeal.
The body shape can be made by anyone.
It's only the combination of the body shape AND headstock design that cannot be produced by anyone other than Gibson.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cerealkiller View PostThats what RJohnstone said.Cold Hollow Machinery
Comment
-
Originally posted by zeegler View PostI'm wondering then, why nobody makes a Les Paul shaped Les Paul anymore. Agile changed their horn, as did many other copiers. Other manufacturers change the body shape in other ways.
Plus, the LP shape has changed a bit over the years as well.
My LP copy is exact in every way to a modern LP except the lower horn.
It has the sharper 70's style cut to it.-Rick
Comment
Comment