They are great for impaling other members in your band.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Reverse headstocks look better.
Collapse
X
-
I like both variations for Jackson/Charvel but prefer the reverse pointy over the regular pointy. The Strat-head is my favorite overall - but I don't like reverse Strat-heads. I agree that the ESP reverse looks great - much better than the ESP standard, IMO. I don't like Ibanez' headstock in either direction. I really like the Robin reverse headstocks, like reverse Explorer headstocks, and LOVE the Peavey V-Type reverse headstock:
Comment
-
i prefer reverse headstocks on any j/c. i love my rhoads pro but it would be better with a reverse headstock IMO. kelly xlr,dinky reverse, yeah i guess its like lookin down at your johnson and it looks better when it points up!!LOL even looks tougher
Comment
-
while all in all i prefer reverse headstocks but i think it kinda depends on the model
Kelly -reversre
Warrior-reverse
King V- both look good
Rhoads- both look good
Soloist/Dinky - regularMy Childrens
-------------
Lefty Ke2 ferrari red w blk bevels
Lefty RR1T trans black
Lefty Sl2HT trans black
Lefty SLSMG!!!!
Comment
-
-
The best looking headstock ever made, IMO, is the standard Jackson pointy. Reverse pointy's are o.k. too but the standard pointy is best. Reverse Stratheads are ugly though.Rudy
www.metalinc.net
Comment
-
It's a tie right now.
All three of mine are revvie's.
PS4, DKMGT, and Model 88.
All dinky or Soloist styles.
It's a functional thing for me...somehow I have a lot of trouble finding the right tuner on non reverse. I don't seem to have that problem on reverse headstocks.
Odd but true.
Comment
-
Sometimes they're better, on my Charvel it looks awesome normal, on my ESP it looks better reversed, on my Dean it doesn't matter it has that V oneLast edited by MetalHeadMat; 10-05-2008, 09:23 PM.
Comment
Comment