Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Gibson getting litigious again?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Gibson getting litigious again?



    Just noticed this on the GMP guitars website. Note the "exciting new redesign in the works" over many of the Gibby-like GMP body styles. Makes me wonder if this is an indication that Gibson has started throwing around C&D letters again, threatening legal action. ...Didn't they learn their lesson with the PRS lawsuit? LOL

    Anyone heard anything?

  • #2
    They did stop Warmoth from make LP Bodies not too long ago.
    MuttznMongrelz
    Recovering G.A.S.-aholic


    1988 Jackson Soloist Custom "Glow In The Dark Lava"
    2006 Jackson Soloist Custom "Red Snakeskin"
    2013 USACG Iceman Custom
    1992 Peavey 5150 Signature Combo



    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      Probably, I always wondered how Hamer and Dean did/does it. Do they royalties?

      Comment


      • #4
        Not as far as I know. The PRS lawsuit made it pretty clear that "similar" does not necessarily mean infringement on Gibson's designs. As long as a reasonable person can know the difference, it's legit.

        Comment


        • #5
          I thought there was actually a licensing agreement between Hamer and Gibson?
          Popular is not the same as good
          Rare is not the same as valuable
          Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get

          Comment


          • #6
            You may be right about Hamer.

            Comment


            • #7
              Is GMP big enough to fight that sort of battle? Sometimes it's just easier to fold...
              The 2nd Amendment: America's Original Homeland Defense.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by xenophobe View Post
                Is GMP big enough to fight that sort of battle? Sometimes it's just easier to fold...
                The more financially viable option and simply slightly redesign your product for future consumption by the masses.
                MuttznMongrelz
                Recovering G.A.S.-aholic


                1988 Jackson Soloist Custom "Glow In The Dark Lava"
                2006 Jackson Soloist Custom "Red Snakeskin"
                2013 USACG Iceman Custom
                1992 Peavey 5150 Signature Combo



                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Oh yeah, that's exactly what Gibson would be counting on. They're the 800 pound gorilla in the room, so they bully the small guys who can't afford a protracted legal battle. Regardless of the fact that the PRS case's precedent means that, in all likelihood, Gibson would lose the lawsuit! Their much bigger financial standing means they simply need to bleed the other guy into legal submission. ...It's total BS!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As I recall, GMP had already pulled their star-body off for a 're-design', so MAYBE it's just an extension of that..
                    Popular is not the same as good
                    Rare is not the same as valuable
                    Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Why would Gibson want a C&D over the Firebird, Vee and Explorer shapes but leave the Pawn Shop out of it? The PS is the most "Gibson" thing GMP makes.

                      I imagine those models just weren't moving and they wanted to revamp them? IMHO the GMP headstock just doesn't work with those models and I could see why they might not be selling in great numbers.

                      BTW here's a PS I've owned for about a year. Its kinda a one trick pony but its a cool trick.

                      Last edited by Dog Boy; 11-10-2015, 10:19 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Anything is possible. Arguably though, from a body style perspective, the Pawn Shop is significantly different "enough" from a LP. Carved top vs. arch top, etc. So it may not have "needed" a redesign vs the other body styles. PLUS Gibson lost the PRS lawsuit on the LP/single cut body style itself, so maybe their lawyers might argue the other models have no legal precedent. It'd be BS, but that's what you do when bullying smaller companies with legal mumbo-jumbo.

                        I agree about the GMP headstock on the other body styles, though. Looks great on a PS, not so well on other body styles. It'd be a good move for them to offer a couple of alternatives more tailored to those other body styles.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X