BC Rich at NAMM?

[Sanctuary]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

[Anders]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

Thanks alot, much appreciated!! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

So they're string through body!? Never noticed that at the pics from behind, but when I looked at them now I did! [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Too bad it doesn't sport an ebony fingerboard... I want that Jr. V either way! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[Sanctuary]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

No worries man. It's actually good to see they're trying some different things. Even though I hate what the company is now...

[wilkinsi]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

ick. bcr imports suck ass imho.

[Budman68]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

<font color="aqua">so then the back of the guitar is painted like the headstock and NOT the joint?


oh, and "unlucky", man you're negative, bro........lighten up! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] </font>

[Sanctuary]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

Here's a look at the back again...

[Anders]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

It really looks like it is shaped that way, and not just painted...?! Did anyone get a closer look at NAMM and is able to confirm this?

[Sanctuary]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

Yeah, I'm hoping BCR will reveal exactly how this system works and whether the hooplah is correct.

[Budman68]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

<font color="aqua">thanks for showing that, by the looks of it, it sure "looks" like a 2 piece.... </font>

[wilkinsi]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

oh, and "unlucky", man you're negative, bro........lighten up! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

lightening up is a big task for me but i'm working on it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Budman68]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

[ QUOTE ]
oh, and "unlucky", man you're negative, bro........lighten up! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

lightening up is a big task for me but i'm working on it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]


<font color="aqua">at-a-boy!! - [img]/images/graemlins/toast.gif[/img] </font>

[Hyperfuzz]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

Ok, why did they put a locking nut on that string-through Beast?

[Budman68]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

<font color="aqua">those images looked photochopped to me, I wouldn't be surprised if that wasn't the actual headstock on that particular guitar. Look at the nut area to the right, it just ain't "right" [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] </font>

[Hyperfuzz]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

Holy Horrible Headstock Budman! I think you are correct!

I just glanced at it and didn't study it too deeply. I thought maybe they were on to something new... [img]/images/graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[Sanctuary]

Re: BC Rich at NAMM?

They are mock-ups (ie chops) that BCR made.