From my experience playing a lot of Les Pauls lately, the woods are lighter, and they sound better. I tried 4 Les Pauls recently, a goldtop historic, a black beauty custom, and two VOS, both 58, one iced tea and one cherry. They all weighed in at around 8 to 8.5 pounds with the blackie weighing a bit less. Very different from the ones a few years ago that still weighed 10.5. And they sounded much better to my ears, due to the lightness, I thought. I also thought the craftsmanship was the same as a decade ago. Of course, I always think Gibson fretwork leaves something to be desired, and all the Gibsons I've brought to my guitar tech required a little extra work. But I wanted a Les Paul, and the extra $40 for more work wasn't going to kill me. On principle, it sucks, but I also would never pay 3k for one.
All the historics I've tried, VOS and non-VOS, have a different sound from the standards. That's why people are paying up for them. The long neck tenons make an easily audible difference, IMO. All that glue in the standards is bound to sop up some of the resonance.
All the historics I've tried, VOS and non-VOS, have a different sound from the standards. That's why people are paying up for them. The long neck tenons make an easily audible difference, IMO. All that glue in the standards is bound to sop up some of the resonance.
Comment