Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carvin Guitars

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    They sure did, Well, thats the story anyways. I'm looking to pick up another one with a maple board.

    Comment


    • #17
      Donny stripped and relogoed this before he sold it to me:



      She's seen better days (needs a refret BAD) but I'm looking forward to playing out with it again.
      Dreaded Silence - Boston Melancholic Metal

      Comment


      • #18


        Carvin's are awesome.





        My YouTube Videos | My SoundCloud Page

        Comment


        • #19
          [QUOTE=thetruthguy;957195]

          QUOTE]

          I didn't realise George Bush Could play...

          Comment


          • #20
            Great guitars. I've had a couple. Been drooling over the CCTs for a while now.

            Comment


            • #21
              "I didn't realise George Bush Could play..."

              He could when he was lil.
              My YouTube Videos | My SoundCloud Page

              Comment


              • #22
                Maybe a dumb question, but what's the point of having twelve pole pieces on the pickups instead of six?
                Scott

                Comment


                • #23
                  I don't know , but I do know that the Carvin pickups are weak and thin sounding.
                  good for country/Cleans and Jazz, not good for high gain thick chunky tone (at least their 7 sting pickups). They sound amazing clean but
                  very thin with gain. My BareKnuckles go in today and I can't wait!!


                  Originally posted by Spivonious View Post
                  Maybe a dumb question, but what's the point of having twelve pole pieces on the pickups instead of six?
                  If this is our perdition, will you walk with me?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Spivonious View Post
                    Maybe a dumb question, but what's the point of having twelve pole pieces on the pickups instead of six?
                    So the strings always line up under a pole piece even when bending. You get no note drop off like you would on a guitar with only six pole pieces. It's sort of like a rail design in that aspect... keep a constant magnetic field under the strings at all times.

                    I've only tried Carvin's C22T and C22N pickups on the three Carvins I owned (DC120 12-string, DC400 and SC90). While the pickups sounded nice, they were a little weak in output for my tastes. I only own the SC90 now, but I've since changed the pickups to a DiMarzio Super Distortion and Super 2, added an extra volume and tone in place of the coil tap switches, and I also put in a DiMarzio "Petrucci" toggle on together hum-cancelling), and I can get either the neck or bridge single coil by itself by rolling down one of the volume knobs). It's a very versatile guitar!
                    I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I've only owned 1 Carvin and had to sell it due to an emergency.
                      Loved it while I had it and would get another no problem.
                      Their CT and Bolt models are the best bang for the buck I have seen in an American guitar.
                      Build a man a fire and he's warm for a day, set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        kmaniac, how much is the weight difference b/n your carvin compared to a standard sl2h? assuming they are both made of alder...

                        I remember Robert Burns telling that a carvin he got recently weighed a lot. Are carvin guitars heavier than their similar spec'd Jackson counterparts?
                        Sam

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by emperor_black View Post
                          I remember Robert Burns telling that a carvin he got recently weighed a lot. Are carvin guitars heavier than their similar spec'd Jackson counterparts?
                          His guitar is made out of walnut, that's why it's heavier. My old DC400 and DC120 were alder and were fairly lightweight, comparable to a Jackson. My swamp ash SC90 is even lighter.
                          I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            having owned a few carvins, I sold them all because I prefer the 25.5 scale over 25" with my stubby fingers.

                            IF they made a DC series guitar with a 25.5" scale. I would sell off all my guitars, and buy two DC's and likely never buy another guitar. Best bang for the buck/quality feature/build guitars u can buy!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by toejam View Post
                              His guitar is made out of walnut, that's why it's heavier.
                              No wonder those walnut pancakes I ate the other day seemed heavier than the usual pancakes.
                              Originally posted by toejam
                              My old DC400 and DC120 were alder and were fairly lightweight, comparable to a Jackson. My swamp ash SC90 is even lighter.
                              I almost ruled out getting a carvin ever because I thought they were all heavy guitars! Thanks for re-kindling the GAS!
                              Sam

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Check it out: http://cgi.ebay.com/Carvin-DC127-ele...QQcmdZViewItem

                                ...must get wife approval ASAP!
                                Scott

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X