Originally posted by rjohnstone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Floyded Suhr Pro Series
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Joe_Steeler View PostCost, plain and simple. The Suhr Pro line is about a streamlined product, to be produced with no mods the specs they offeer are IT. Quick to market at a reasonable cost.I want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.
- Newc
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jaydog View Postsuhr guitars are way to pricey. hell, you can get a u.s.a. soloist for a lower price than a suhr.Special deals for JCF members on Jackson/Charvel, Suhr, Anderson, Nash, Splawn, Bogner, LSL, Ibanez, Diezel, Friedman, Bad Cat, 3rd Power, Dr. Z, ENGL and more. FREE SHIPPING! 0% FINANCING!
Comment
-
Originally posted by mattsmusiccenter View PostHave you played a Suhr?
Comments on a few points:
I can't believe that anyone would play a Suhr and not admit that it was a quality guitar, even if it wasn't for them.
The prices on the Suhr Pro Series are pretty reasonable, even if they are more than some production USA Soloist models. Both are a good value and great axe. It's just a matter of preference.
I agree that basswood is soft, but while it might not be everyone's first choice, it does sound pretty darn good. I remember how many times I was amazed when guys used to just grab an Ibanez RG with a trem and maple/maple or maple/rosewood board, plug into a Marshall and it sounded great. Sure, it might not have been the perfect guitar, but for $500 bucks with Ibanez pickups and locking system, how could you go wrong when it sounded like that?
Also, MANY artists, such as Eddie Van Halen, John Petrucci, Joe Satriana, Steve Vai, Paul Gilbert, etc. have chosen basswood for their signature models. So since they can choose whatever they want, I take that as reasonable evidence that basswood is a viable tone option.
And I think that John Suhr and Tom Anderson offer all of the traditional body woods if you want them, at either no upcharge (alder, ash, etc.) or a small one for mahogany. So I would have to think that they wouldn't push basswood if they weren't believers in the tone. I know that my basswood Suhr convinced me after many years of resisting trying this particular wood.
Finally, regarding the original FR, John Suhr has defended the bridge for years, but to my knowledge they are now moving away from it because of quality issues and the fact that the Gotoh has a better radius (14') for their guitars. They are going to a lot of trouble to work on the CNC programming to make the change- and that costs money.
And if you look around, many of the Gotoh Floyd models sell for the same as an original FR. So I think it's not about saving money, but rather using what they think is the best product on their guitars.Last edited by HiOctane; 10-12-2007, 07:43 PM.
Comment
-
I've never played a Suhr, but hear good things.
I ain't buying the OFR "QC" argument, though. The Gotoh may be a decent unit, but IMHO it's not even in the same league as the Original Floyd. I'm sure they will be cool, quality axes. But, IMHO, that's a lot of coin for a guitar with cheaper licensed-import hardware.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shreddermon View PostI've never played a Suhr, but hear good things.
I ain't buying the OFR "QC" argument, though. The Gotoh may be a decent unit, but IMHO it's not even in the same league as the Original Floyd. I'm sure they will be cool, quality axes. But, IMHO, that's a lot of coin for a guitar with cheaper licensed-import hardware.
BTW, OFRs are imported tooI want REAL change. I want dead bodies littering the capitol.
- Newc
Comment
-
I played two Surhs... both unplugged.
AMAZING build quality. Very bright sounding. Not very loud accoustically though, and to me, lacking that thing that'd make me go 'wow'. In the UK they're over 5,000 bucks keep that in mind...I've played dead Schecters that impressed me more... I mean they were fantastic guitars and for all I know the magic happens when plugged in, but it wasn't as humbling a experience for me. They were the most expensive guitars I'd ever touched (I never played a PRS, Anderson or whatever guitar over 1,500 bucks).
Comment
-
Suhr's are some of the best guitars ever.... they destroy Jacksons IMO
don't like the OFR to Gotoh thing though.... I think OFR is better than Gotoh in every way"There is nothing more fearful than imagination without taste" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
"To be stupid, selfish and have good health are three requirements for happiness, though if stupidity is lacking, all is lost" - Gustave Flaubert
Comment
-
The Gotoh thing is my only complaint when you consider the cost factor.
Every Suhr I've played felt great. The build quality is spot on, but I think it some how cheapens the instrument when you put on a second rate trem.
If the OFR has "QC issues", then why not a Schaller?
I don't care for Gotoh trems, but that's my personal opinion of them.
I can see the radius thing being an issue and that it has been a common complaint among OFR users, but it can be dealt with by adding shims.Last edited by rjohnstone; 10-12-2007, 02:50 PM.-Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by hippietim View PostJohn Suhr has been made much mention of this on other forums. Are you questioning his honesty/integrity? My experience with Suhr is that he has always been a very straight shooter.
BTW, OFRs are imported too
And, no duh - OFRs are made by Schaller in Germany. As far as I'm concerned, the OFR unit is the "gold standard" of locking trems. I have NEVER had a problem with an OFR. The Gotoh isn't even in the same league.
Comment
Comment