Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This guitar is nicer than anything Jackson has ever built

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by rjohnstone View Post
    Or is it a laminate? :ROTF:



    Since there is more than two pieces, on some parts of the body anyway, wouldn't that make this plywood? Expensive, but still... more that two layers and we're talking plywood. :ROTF:
    Maybe Gibson should sue them for ripping off their Pancake Body! HA!
    I'm angry because you're stupid

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Bengal View Post
      Really? You really buy that load of bullshit. Well, I'm glad you do but I don't.

      The thread title, "This guitar is nicer than anything Jackson has ever built". You thought that wouldn't get people riled up in a JACKSON FORUM? If you didn't think so, you're an idiot.

      But really what you are saying is this guitar LOOKS like it's better than any Jackson I've ever SEEN. That's what it should have said since you haven't played every Jackson and have barely played one of these Pancakes. Or have you? Is it there yet or is it "finally coming in"? You have not even played one yet, have you? So you really don't know shit, do you?

      Busted.
      You still aren't making any sense and seem to be caught up in how smart you think you are, assuming countless things again... try again

      Comment


      • #63
        This is more interesting than watching the TV.
        He's got terrible legs...
        Fwopping, you know you want to!

        VI VI VI: the editor of the Beast!

        There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary. Those who do and those who don't.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by sakeido View Post
          You still aren't making any sense and seem to be caught up in how smart you think you are, assuming countless things again... try again
          I went back and edited that post. You have not played one yet so how can you come to that conclusion that it's better than anything Jackson has made?

          That I want to know.

          I'm not sure how I'm caught up in how smart I am. Maybe the term umbrage went over your head? Don't like it that the top on your 5K guitar is a veneer? I don't get it.
          I'm angry because you're stupid

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Bengal View Post
            I went back and edited that post. You have not played one yet so how can you come to that conclusion that it's better than anything Jackson has made?

            That I want to know.

            I'm not sure how I'm caught up in how smart I am. Maybe the term umbrage went over your head? Don't like it that the top on your 5K guitar is a veneer? I don't get it.
            I haven't played this one yet, you mean. Cosmetically, it certainly is better than any Jackson I have ever seen, period.

            I thought your juxtaposition of a relatively uncommon word, umbrage, with a mispelled word, vaneer, was an interesting lyrical device. So, back to the "you are not as smart as you think" thing again...

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by sakeido View Post
              I haven't played this one yet, you mean. Cosmetically, it certainly is better than any Jackson I have ever seen, period.

              I thought your juxtaposition of a relatively uncommon word, umbrage, with a mispelled word, vaneer, was an interesting lyrical device. So, back to the "you are not as smart as you think" thing again...
              Fucking hell, have you been sitting wanking and reading the dicshunhairy!
              Fwopping, you know you want to!

              VI VI VI: the editor of the Beast!

              There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary. Those who do and those who don't.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by sakeido View Post
                I haven't played this one yet, you mean. Cosmetically, it certainly is better than any Jackson I have ever seen, period.

                I thought your juxtaposition of a relatively uncommon word, umbrage, with a mispelled word, vaneer, was an interesting lyrical device. So, back to the "you are not as smart as you think" thing again...
                So you haven't played one then. You don't know shit about these other than "they look cool".

                Sigh. Nice try.

                Yep, I misspell shit all the time. I have no problem with it. The people that do are usually people I'm "debating" with that have no legs to stand on. So they resort to misspelling. Very, very lame. Game, Set, And Match.

                So it looks better than ANY Jackson ever built huh?

                You have to love someone who wants to argue these types of things without any hands on expierence. Fuckin' lame man. Even I wouldn't do that.

                Fuckin Kotex Maxi Pads are the best. I mean, have you seen them? Looks like they could absorb all types of pussy juice. So Kotex is the shit, fuck all the others.

                Sounds stupid, doesn't it?

                EDIT: Sorry ladies. I used that as an absurd point. I don't really know if Kotex absorbs the best or not. But they LOOK like they do!
                I'm angry because you're stupid

                Comment


                • #68
                  all ripping aside....

                  i am TRULY curious WHY the builder has a different wood between the top and the main body, in the area where a normal forearm contour would be. i am also curious why it looks as if some ebony (or filler, or what ever it is) seems to be "seeped" into the maple(?) forearm contour filler...and underneath the maple at the back underside of the guitar.

                  also, i am curious why this giutar looks SO much like an ibanez body....does the builder have any other shapes?

                  i won't comment on the headstock.

                  now, i haven't seen it in person - or touched/played it, for that matter - but, i am wondering what makes it so awesome. the bridge is nothing out of the ordinary, the shape is VERY common, AND while some of the materials seem to be very nice - rosewood neck, etc. - the guitar doesn't seem to offer ANYTHING out of the ordinary. i mean, MAYBE it IS like having your hands on the most sensual wood ever (no pecker jokes, please), but VISUALLY, it is very bland. even alembic layers the woods to make the instrument, AT LEAST, look like a cutting board...

                  while i know your defenses are up, could you please inform of us as to WHAT really makes this giutar so much "better"....and could you address the issue of the mysterious light-colored wood where a forearm contour appears to have been covered?

                  thank you kindly, sir.
                  GEAR:

                  some guitars...WITH STRINGS!!!! most of them have those sticks like on guitar hero....AWESOME!!!!

                  some amps...they have some glowing bottle like things in them...i think my amps do that modelling thing....COOL, huh?!?!?!

                  and finally....

                  i have those little plastic "chips" used to hit the strings...WHOA!!!!

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by shobet View Post
                    Fucking hell, have you been sitting wanking and reading the dicshunhairy!
                    +1,000,000
                    I think it took him a good 5 minutes to construct that sentence.
                    And judging by the time lapse between posts, I was right. Give or take a few seconds.
                    -Rick

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Well, there are many types of asses. Dumbasses, jackasses, smartasses etc.
                      Bengal..is a jackass sometimes and a smartass most times (I say this with much love and respect, but because he's NOT a dumbass, he knows this:ROTF

                      You on the other hand, didn't give it a lot of thought before you posted a thread dogging Jacksons on a JACKSON forum. Of course you are going to get a negative reaction. Why didn't you just title it, "Check this out" or something like that??

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by guitarsjb View Post
                        You on the other hand, didn't give it a lot of thought before you posted a thread dogging Jacksons on a JACKSON forum. ?
                        Dogging! FFS don't get Rsmacker involved in this thread, he'll have pictures!
                        Fwopping, you know you want to!

                        VI VI VI: the editor of the Beast!

                        There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary. Those who do and those who don't.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Bengal View Post
                          So you haven't played one then. You don't know shit about these other than "they look cool".

                          Sigh. Nice try.

                          Yep, I misspell shit all the time. I have no problem with it. The people that do are usually people I'm "debating" with that have no legs to stand on. So they resort to misspelling. Very, very lame. Game, Set, And Match.

                          So it looks better than ANY Jackson ever built huh?

                          You have to love someone who wants to argue these types of things without any hands on expierence. Fuckin' lame man. Even I wouldn't do that.

                          Fuckin Kotex Maxi Pads are the best. I mean, have you seen them? Looks like they could absorb all types of pussy juice. So Kotex is the shit, fuck all the others.

                          Sounds stupid, doesn't it?
                          Jesus Christ you fucking moron what could lead me to say "I haven't play this one, you mean?"
                          case A: I have never played one of these guitars
                          case B: I have never played the guitar pictured
                          Now, take that quote, and break it down into something nice and easy for you. "I have not played this guitar." So case B is true. But, case A could be (and is) false. I played one before, through a 5150. Playability wise it was on par with a Parker Fly (which is to say, much better than any of the USA Jacksons I've ever played) and tonally with a lot of gain it sounded like most guitars do when run through a 5150 set to Totally Pissed Off except with the kind of note definition and articulation you would expect from a 28 5/8" baritone tuned to E standard.

                          Fuck playing coy with you. You're a huge dumbass so I'm just going to beat you over the head with your own stupidity, you presumptuous asshat.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by markD View Post
                            i am also curious why it looks as if some ebony (or filler, or what ever it is) seems to be "seeped" into the maple(?) forearm contour filler...and underneath the maple at the back underside of the guitar.
                            That's what I was trying to figure out before the thread went downhill.
                            I seriously believe that it is a fuck up that he tried to turn into some form of artistic flair.
                            I mean who goes through all the trouble to cut a forearm contour only to fill it back in (with a different colored piece of wood mind you) and then cap it with a veneer?
                            -Rick

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by guitarsjb View Post
                              Well, there are many types of asses. Dumbasses, jackasses, smartasses etc.
                              Bengal..is a jackass sometimes and a smartass most times (I say this with much love and respect, but because he's NOT a dumbass, he knows this:ROTF
                              Thanks Jeri.

                              I think.

                              Guilty as charged. And sometimes I can be a dumbass too.

                              Just not in this thread! HA!
                              I'm angry because you're stupid

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by rjohnstone View Post
                                That's what I was trying to figure out before the thread went downhill.
                                I seriously believe that it is a fuck up that he tried to turn into some form of artistic flair.
                                I mean who goes through all the trouble to cut a forearm contour only to fill it back in (with a different colored piece of wood mind you) and then cap it with a veneer?
                                i know. i am a fan of exotic wood guitars, but that use of wood seems like a mistake. if the builder WERE going for a "tone wood" sandwich, it would make more sense to layer a COMPLETE piece of contrasting wood beneath the top and back.

                                i don't get it, and i'd liie to be educated about it. it just seems odd...
                                GEAR:

                                some guitars...WITH STRINGS!!!! most of them have those sticks like on guitar hero....AWESOME!!!!

                                some amps...they have some glowing bottle like things in them...i think my amps do that modelling thing....COOL, huh?!?!?!

                                and finally....

                                i have those little plastic "chips" used to hit the strings...WHOA!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X