So today as an XMas gift I bought a Fender FSR Straight Six guitar. "Limited" to 800 or so for small dealers. Unique anyway, and they are going for the old school Charvel feel.
SPECS:
Alder Body (3 Piece)
21 Fret Maple neck/fretboard (one piece), Rosewood skunk stripe
Vintage Tremolo
Single Atomic Humbucking Pickup
Volume Control
Three ply pickguard
Matte Black Paint
Alright...so out of the box, the guitar is nicely set up by the shop, with the trem floating. Amazingly it stays n tune nicely. Plug it in, and here we go. The guitar is very bright. I had kind of forgotten how bright guitars without a tone pot can be. Playability is pretty smooth, and the seems a bit shaved down from your standard MIM. Very smooth satin finish. to it. Fretwork is very nicely done, and the guitar plays like a champ. All hardware seems solid and does it job well. The only minor flaw is it seems like a little too much glue seeped otu aroudn the 17th or so fret. I'm sure it will come off with play, but seems a hair sloppy.
The body of the guitar has a top notch satin black finish. I think it is poly, but it is smooth and crisp looking. It will smudge up, but it has not turned shiny, which can happen with cheaper matte finishes. The three ply pickguard is nice touch. The humbucking pickup is bright, and has a nice mid bump. Good harmonics and smooth treble response. It's bass response is tight but will not punch a hole in the wall In terms of "hottness" it is not as hot or bright as a JB, but has more cut, clarity, and output than your normal overwound PAF.
Assembly of it is tight, with no finish flaws, misfitting parts, or poorly done screws. The skunk stripe is unnoticeable. The pickup is a nice choice for the guitar, though the sound of it is a bit of an acquired taste as it is not easily comparable to your normal Duncan or DiMarzio IMO. Overall, a very tight guitar that nicely captures the feel of an early 80s, pre-Floyd hot rod. At $399, it is a KILLER value. It does however bring up an interesting question...
WHY is this not a Charvel? This is the essence of what a Charvel is and why I bought the guitar. The only thing Fender are the hands making it and the logo. Everything Screams Charvel. No doubt that at $399 and marked Charvel, it would sell like a hot cake and appeal to the lower end market. Maybe the world is not ready for a Mexican Charvel, I don't know.
Pictures to come tomorrow...
SPECS:
Alder Body (3 Piece)
21 Fret Maple neck/fretboard (one piece), Rosewood skunk stripe
Vintage Tremolo
Single Atomic Humbucking Pickup
Volume Control
Three ply pickguard
Matte Black Paint
Alright...so out of the box, the guitar is nicely set up by the shop, with the trem floating. Amazingly it stays n tune nicely. Plug it in, and here we go. The guitar is very bright. I had kind of forgotten how bright guitars without a tone pot can be. Playability is pretty smooth, and the seems a bit shaved down from your standard MIM. Very smooth satin finish. to it. Fretwork is very nicely done, and the guitar plays like a champ. All hardware seems solid and does it job well. The only minor flaw is it seems like a little too much glue seeped otu aroudn the 17th or so fret. I'm sure it will come off with play, but seems a hair sloppy.
The body of the guitar has a top notch satin black finish. I think it is poly, but it is smooth and crisp looking. It will smudge up, but it has not turned shiny, which can happen with cheaper matte finishes. The three ply pickguard is nice touch. The humbucking pickup is bright, and has a nice mid bump. Good harmonics and smooth treble response. It's bass response is tight but will not punch a hole in the wall In terms of "hottness" it is not as hot or bright as a JB, but has more cut, clarity, and output than your normal overwound PAF.
Assembly of it is tight, with no finish flaws, misfitting parts, or poorly done screws. The skunk stripe is unnoticeable. The pickup is a nice choice for the guitar, though the sound of it is a bit of an acquired taste as it is not easily comparable to your normal Duncan or DiMarzio IMO. Overall, a very tight guitar that nicely captures the feel of an early 80s, pre-Floyd hot rod. At $399, it is a KILLER value. It does however bring up an interesting question...
WHY is this not a Charvel? This is the essence of what a Charvel is and why I bought the guitar. The only thing Fender are the hands making it and the logo. Everything Screams Charvel. No doubt that at $399 and marked Charvel, it would sell like a hot cake and appeal to the lower end market. Maybe the world is not ready for a Mexican Charvel, I don't know.
Pictures to come tomorrow...
Comment