Hey people, can anyone tell me how the ESP eclipse neck plays? Hoping they aren't as thick as the Les Paul necks and a bit more playable for mere mortals like me. Was thinking of picking one up, there's a few of them on my side of the pond for good prices.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ESP eclipse neck??
Collapse
X
-
I haven't played a Les Paul proper, but I have an ESP Eclipse II and previously owned another one. The neck is definitely not thick, but it is also not Ibanez thin either. I am pretty much a Jackson person and the ESP Eclipse II neck is very comfortable. Going from a WR1 or a SLATQH neck to the ESP is not a problem at all. On a side note, my hands are on the smaller side, so neck size/shape is very important to me.
-
Originally posted by iced_earth View PostI haven't played a Les Paul proper, but I have an ESP Eclipse II and previously owned another one. The neck is definitely not thick, but it is also not Ibanez thin either. I am pretty much a Jackson person and the ESP Eclipse II neck is very comfortable. Going from a WR1 or a SLATQH neck to the ESP is not a problem at all. On a side note, my hands are on the smaller side, so neck size/shape is very important to me.
Thanks man, I have a WR - 1 myself so that was a handy bit of info. Don't have a string thru guitar at the moment which is what has me interested in one of these, plus the finish on them is very nice. Can you get a nice low action on it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mjkv1 View PostThanks man, I have a WR - 1 myself so that was a handy bit of info. Don't have a string thru guitar at the moment which is what has me interested in one of these, plus the finish on them is very nice. Can you get a nice low action on it?
Comment
-
I'm assuming you're on about the newer Les Paul shaped Eclipse and not the older Tele shaped one.
I can talk about the older one and that has a neck like a tree trunk. I love it.Fwopping, you know you want to!
VI VI VI: the editor of the Beast!
There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary. Those who do and those who don't.
Comment
-
I had an Eclipse of some sort - it played great. As I remember the neck had a similar shape to the 60's Gibson style, but it was thinner...Popular is not the same as good
Rare is not the same as valuable
Worth is what someone will pay, not what you want to get
Comment
-
Originally posted by mjkv1 View PostThanks man, I have a WR - 1 myself so that was a handy bit of info. Don't have a string thru guitar at the moment which is what has me interested in one of these, plus the finish on them is very nice. Can you get a nice low action on it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by iced_earth View PostI did a quick comparison this weekend... The WR-1 felt slightly wider and a touch less thick in depth, but there wasnt much difference between the two. I put my calipers to measure the neck width and the ESP measured 43 mm at the nut, 53 mm at the 12th fret. The Jackson measured 44 and 53. There was maybe 1 mm difference in depth at the 12th fret.
Cool, thats a great help man thanks!!! I'm probably gonna try one out this weekend if there's still one left in the shop.
Comment
Comment