Honestly does it matter? If you find a guitar by any maker, from any country and feels good in your hands that you can get the tone and emotion out of it - buy it. brand names mean nothing. I like my Epi, it's sweet as can be, but if I suddenly ran into a boat load of cash I'm buying nothing but custom shop jacksons and gibsons. the epi will be played but probably not much
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Honestly, what the difference between Gibson and Epiphone?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by eakinj View PostHonestly does it matter? If you find a guitar by any maker, from any country and feels good in your hands that you can get the tone and emotion out of it - buy it. brand names mean nothing. I like my Epi, it's sweet as can be, but if I suddenly ran into a boat load of cash I'm buying nothing but custom shop jacksons and gibsons. the epi will be played but probably not muchWarPig____________________________________________
"Live every day as if it were your last...
...one day it will be."
Comment
-
Originally posted by PowerTube View PostOkay, so Epiphone Les Paul bodies are made from mahogany. Gibson Les Paul bodies are made from "Honduran" mahogany (oooohhhh!!!!!).
So other than maybe some hardware differences, are Gibsons worth the 400% or higher price difference? Something in me says that the answer is no.
I would also apply the same question toward Fender and Squier. The Fender Strats seems to have thicker necks and are a tad heavier than their Squier counterparts, so that's probably a body wood difference.
I can notice the difference in Jacksons, but not in the others.
Discuss!
If you can't notice the difference between a Gibson Les Paul and an Epi Les Paul, then you're definitely better off with an Epi.
Comment
-
The difference is when you buy a Gibson, youre paying for the guitar, when you buy an Epiphone, youre paying into Gibson's profits. Guitar companies have import lines to stay profitable. I would rather pay $2,000 for a guitar that cost $2,000 to produce then to pay $600 for a guitar that cost $50 to produce. The whole "bang for buck" arguemnt is ass backwards with most people. If they were the same price, you'd always take the Gibson, so there must be a difference.............
Comment
-
I posted this a long time ago here at these forums and you might be able to find it with the search function, but I was at the Dallas Guitar Show and as I was strolling down an aisle, I saw an Epiphone dealer in a far corner. He was yapping on his cell phone, so I just started looking through his inventory.
The first thing I noticed were his EXTREMELY low prices and the majority of his Les Pauls were the higher end models. Now, I don't know about you guys, but when I pick up a guitar, its usually by the neck where it connects with the headstock. Every single guitar had a crack behind the nut.
When fruitloop got off the phone, I inquired about the broken guitars and he stated that it was a design flaw, that the necks were too thin and made from sub-par material. Once the guitars were strung to pitch, one good boink on the neck and they became a musical hand grenade. He also said that these guitars were not designed for heavy gauge strings such as .010 and .011.
The second thing I noticed was the overall width of the neck from about the first fret to the fifth. It felt extremely narrow, almost like a toy guitar. Actually, it felt more like a banjo neck than a guitar.
One thing about it, they sure are pretty. I'll be the first to admit, I love pretty guitars. But I also love quality, playability, and tone. Yes, Gibson has screwed the pooch over the years when it comes to quality control, but so has every company! If you like Epiphones, that's great. I'm not gonna sit here and knock your choice. At the same time, don't try blowing smoke up my ass and telling me that they're as good as comparable models of Gibsons. I've owned a buttload of LPs and I've played a bunch of Epiphone LPs. The only thing they have in common is their shape and they fucked that up with the Epi's godawful headstock!"POOP"
Comment
-
Just so there's no confusion (Because I think I'm confused) wasn't Epiphone an American company that Gibson bought? I know a lot of old Epiphones are highly valued. I know this has little to do with the current product, I'm just curious.In the future though I need to remember to not buy guitars while on Nyquil
Comment
-
Originally posted by eakinj View PostJust so there's no confusion (Because I think I'm confused) wasn't Epiphone an American company that Gibson bought? I know a lot of old Epiphones are highly valued. I know this has little to do with the current product, I'm just curious.-------------------------
Blank yo!
Comment
-
Originally posted by surfreak View PostIf you can't notice the difference between a Gibson Les Paul and an Epi Les Paul, then you're definitely better off with an Epi.
Yes, I can tell the difference. I just don't think I can tell a difference of $2100.00.Member - National Sarcasm Society
"Oh, sure. Like we need your support."
Comment
-
Originally posted by eakinj View PostJust so there's no confusion (Because I think I'm confused) wasn't Epiphone an American company that Gibson bought? I know a lot of old Epiphones are highly valued. I know this has little to do with the current product, I'm just curious.
Epiphone started an ad campaign with the phrase, "When 'good enough' isn't good enough." They were fierce competitors back then.Member - National Sarcasm Society
"Oh, sure. Like we need your support."
Comment
-
Originally posted by PowerTube View PostYes. In fact, back in the 30's or 40's, whenever it was, Gibson started the slogan, "Only a Gibson is Good Enough."
Epiphone started an ad campaign with the phrase, "When 'good enough' isn't good enough." They were fierce competitors back then.-------------------------
Blank yo!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grandturk View PostSo, I guess Epiphone is going with "When 'good enough' is much too good."Member - National Sarcasm Society
"Oh, sure. Like we need your support."
Comment
-
Comment