I like the narrower string spacing of the JT-6 and don't mind the odd fine tuners at all, but the low-quality pot metal of the baseplate really does affect tone, imo. Not sure what the sustain block was made of on the JT-6, but that may be a big factor as well. At any rate, an OFR has brightened up the guitar & added sustain each time I've made the swap.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Model 6 problem...any ideas?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MakeAJazzNoiseHere View PostOutside of the string lock I don't see what's so bad about the JT-6. :dunno:
Comment
-
Originally posted by dg View PostI like the narrower string spacing of the JT-6 and don't mind the odd fine tuners at all, but the low-quality pot metal of the baseplate really does affect tone, imo. Not sure what the sustain block was made of on the JT-6, but that may be a big factor as well. At any rate, an OFR has brightened up the guitar & added sustain each time I've made the swap.
I guess if I wanted the best I would put a Floyd on it but the JT-6 sounds OK on this one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MakeAJazzNoiseHere View PostThe one I'm using might be an oddball... It's got a Jackson logo on it, and it's chrome. It also has a brass sustain block AFAICT. It's set up blocked and the guitar sounds just fantastic. Plus with the narrow string spacing I was able to have correct pole alignment with the standard-spaced Duncan.
I guess if I wanted the best I would put a Floyd on it but the JT-6 sounds OK on this one."Your work is ingenius…it’s quality work….and there are simply too many notes…that’s all, just cut a few, and it’ll be perfect."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MetalMedal II View PostI've always said the JT-6 has a great design, just poorly executed with the subpar materials.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MetalMedal II View PostI've always said the JT-6 has a great design, just poorly executed with the subpar materials. That being said, I still have a couple guitars w them...even a USA Jackson that it came stock on. BTW, they all had the Jackson logo on it, whether it was on a J or C. They came out with the all chrome ones on a couple transition model Charvels before going to the toothpaste series. The narrower string space I'd think would be a good selling point for those wanting those specs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by straycat View PostChrome JT-6's I think only came on the spectrum models.
"Your work is ingenius…it’s quality work….and there are simply too many notes…that’s all, just cut a few, and it’ll be perfect."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MakeAJazzNoiseHere View PostMost of the new Duncans should fit the routes these days, they've re-done a lot of them so they don't have the tab on them anymore.
they should but sometimes dont. mainly cause the wire comes straight out the side. unless your routing for the wires go across then down the humbucker route it will not fit right.
the jt6 sucks for the fact that if you dont have small fingers it can be a pain to fine tune. of course thats my opinion. i had a hard time with my little asian hands. lol.
Comment
Comment