Came across this old post on the Seymour Duncan forum discussing how the Charvel Desolation Series aren't very true to the spirit of Charvel guitars: https://www.seymourduncan.com/forum/...=1#post3090983
Particularly, these two lines about the Model Series stood out to me:
Was this the prevailing attitude from guitarists when the Model Series were announced and produced in the 1980s? "Killed the brand?" That's a bit extreme, no?
I realize Charvels were solely American-made up until 1986-ish, so I can understand why the decision to introduce the very first imported Jacksons/Charvels might have been seen by some as diluting the brand. At the time, the resistance may have been justified, but the Model Series guitars were pretty great (whether in retrospect or just approaching them objectively in any time period) so I'm dumbstruck by the enduring snobby attitude in a post from as recent as 2012.
Particularly, these two lines about the Model Series stood out to me:
[The Desolation Series] is worse than the Charvel model series debacle of the mid to late 80s. At least the model series sort of followed the Charvel formula.
[The Desolation Series] just makes a mess of it all and is a disgrace to the Charvel name just like the model series was in the mid to late 80s which killed the brand.
I realize Charvels were solely American-made up until 1986-ish, so I can understand why the decision to introduce the very first imported Jacksons/Charvels might have been seen by some as diluting the brand. At the time, the resistance may have been justified, but the Model Series guitars were pretty great (whether in retrospect or just approaching them objectively in any time period) so I'm dumbstruck by the enduring snobby attitude in a post from as recent as 2012.
Comment