Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charvel questione

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Charvel questione

    Could you define the exact year it was build, by looking at the serial number (371467) ?
    And is it 100% a plus model

    Tia

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Charvel questione

      Originally posted by Codex:
      Could you define the exact year it was build, by looking at the serial number (371467) ?
      <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">No, you can't. But they were only built as Charvels in '90 & '91, so it can only be one of those two years. By '92, the Fusion was a Jackson model.
      And is it 100% a plus model
      <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you mean, is it 100% original (ie. no replacement parts)?
      If you mean, are we 100% sure that it's a Fusion Plus, then yes, yes we are [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
      Hail yesterday

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Charvel questione

        I'd took a look at the back of both hums and saw on each a sticker with JC-90C on it, also CHARVEL®

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Charvel questione

          Originally posted by Codex:
          I'd took a look at the back of both hums and saw on each a sticker with JC-90C on it, also CHARVEL®
          <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Sorry type error J-90C [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Charvel questione

            But is it standard 2 times a J-90C [img]graemlins/scratchhead.gif[/img]

            Comment

            Working...
            X