Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newbie / Charvel 88

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Newbie / Charvel 88

    Hello everyone!
    I have been looking for a Charvel 88 for years and found one a few months back. The SN is (308). It has some play were and by no means NIB.

    I am still on the hunt for a few strat head Charvel's a few Jackson USA's and a Jackson 88.

    Best regards

    Jackson/Charvelfan





















  • #2
    Es bueno.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks tolstoi,
      I gave the pawn shop a hard time when I checked it out as I pulled the guitar apart before I bought it to check and see if everything was correct for this model.
      Best
      Last edited by Jackson/Charvelfan; 09-15-2007, 03:39 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Nice Model 88! Welcome to the JCF!

        Comment


        • #5
          You lucky dog, welcome to the board. I am still searching.
          Just one more guitar!

          Comment


          • #6
            Welcome and sweet AXE you have there,I had one wayyyyyyy back in 89ish.For whatever reason I sold it to another friend ( IIRC needed $$$ for my 70 GTO) than the guy I sold it to. . ready in his kitchen tried to do the Yngwie flip around and well didnt turn out and it smashed the pointed headstock right off right infront of me .
            True story. Hey happy posting.
            Last edited by ADR; 09-16-2007, 11:11 AM.
            Henrik Danhage Sig Heavy Relic

            Comment


            • #7
              Love the 88! Nice axe and welcome to the JCF!

              Comment


              • #8
                Sweet.
                I love the tobacco burst finish.
                Question, is the neck supposed to be finished or natural?
                Mine is just buffed, no clear on it:

                Comment


                • #9
                  If IIRC they came finished,yours looks sanded down in the pix above look at the heel contour. .not a smooth arc.
                  Henrik Danhage Sig Heavy Relic

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Good eye, ADR. There is a definite dip there.
                    I never really noticed. I'm not going to go back and
                    change it, though, I have gotten used to it.

                    Between the near mint body on mine, and the
                    near mint neck on J/C fan's, we might have a
                    real nice Model 88!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I don't know if I'd call one with an added tone knob near mint...

                      I do like these guitars though. Even though they have a reverse headstock...
                      I'm angry because you're stupid

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bengal View Post
                        I don't know if I'd call one with an added tone knob near mint...

                        I do like these guitars though. Even though they have a reverse headstock...
                        Tone control: Yeah, I knew that as soon as I wrote it. It's been there so long for me that I don't consider it.

                        Reverse headstock: I don't know what people have against them, I like them and have no problem with them. Perhaps it's because I'm a lefty that plays right handed.

                        Another thing, I sometimes see people kind of trashing the EMG's...I have found this to be the most nuetral, well rounded pickup there is. Very easy to get a wide range of sounds from. Although I can't say for sure what the Jackson pup would have sounded like in this guitar, all of my experiences with the EMG 81's and 85's have been very stable, quiet, and good for recording. I have also grown so accustomed to it in this guitar, I'm not all that sure I would change it.

                        Especially since I've been told too many times it's been mutilated beyond repair by someone putting a tone knob on it.

                        10-15 years from now, it won't make much difference.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Cygnus X1 View Post
                          Tone control: Yeah, I knew that as soon as I wrote it. It's been there so long for me that I don't consider it.

                          Reverse headstock: I don't know what people have against them, I like them and have no problem with them. Perhaps it's because I'm a lefty that plays right handed.

                          Another thing, I sometimes see people kind of trashing the EMG's...I have found this to be the most nuetral, well rounded pickup there is. Very easy to get a wide range of sounds from. Although I can't say for sure what the Jackson pup would have sounded like in this guitar, all of my experiences with the EMG 81's and 85's have been very stable, quiet, and good for recording. I have also grown so accustomed to it in this guitar, I'm not all that sure I would change it.

                          Especially since I've been told too many times it's been mutilated beyond repair by someone putting a tone knob on it.

                          10-15 years from now, it won't make much difference.
                          I may get bashed for this but I wouldn't change the pickup either. The EMG is a better pickup than the one that came in there. I like EMG's. I have them in about half of my guitars...

                          The tone knob is really no big deal. Looks like it was well done. It does devalue it a bit but who cares, right? You like the guitar, screw the resale value. Play the shit out of it...

                          I don't like Jacksons headstock reversed. I think it looks a bit to angled. But to each their own...

                          I have a buddy that's a lefty but plays right handed. Thats how I would have done it if I was a lefty. Better right handed guitars out there...
                          I'm angry because you're stupid

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Thanks, Bengal.
                            I got the guitar as it is. At the time, it wasn't anything special,
                            but I hung onto it and didn't abuse it because I had a feeling it was too well
                            built to be just another Charvel. So I abused my Hamer instead....

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yeah, beat the Hamer instead...

                              Those mahogany bodies are quite drool worthy...
                              I'm angry because you're stupid

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X