Which of these RR's do you prefer?

[cr500guy]

Whatever it is, those pics look like they were done in Kisekae or something. They don't look like photos of real guitars.

And if it's an RR5, how come it's got crappy Detonators in it?

If you're basing your buying on those two pics, I'd seriously suggest you get to a shop and check out the real things.

I'm not buying one.

I just posted them because the polka dotted RR-V is unique and the RR3 Looks like an RR5. So it's unique as well. There is a guy locally who has one of those RR3's.

[MartinBarre]

There's no way on Earth those are photos of real guitars.

[cr500guy]

There's no way on Earth those are photos of real guitars.

I realize that. But both depictions are REAL Jackson models. Here's a real life picture of an RR3 Japanese made guitar with a tunomatic bridge. That's my point. Weird eh?
Ignore the picture date. It was on a default. Pic was taken in the last few weeks

[toejam]

Interesting. Seems it's an exclusive run for AMS. http://www.americanmusical.com/Item--i-JAC-2940012-LIST

[RR666]

ive seen other places selling rr3's with TOMs and rr5 like paintjob as well

[777]

The RR3 has a trem, not a fixed bridge like the RR5... unless they've made some strange new model recently. Wouldn't be the first time somebody was wrong about advertising something, though.

My RR5-FR...................

[toejam]

My RR5-FR...................

Cool guitar. We know about those, and they're on Jackson's site. Just the RR3 with a TOM bridge seemed to pop out of nowhere and is not on Jackson's site.