Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This guitar is?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This guitar is?

    Thank you very much friends!
    They have helped me a lot in my first post!

    Now need your help again to identify a Jackson!

    Supposedly is a Japanese RR3
    Serial number: 9696 ***

    Some pictures:









    Thank you very much again!

    It is impossible to find good information about these guitars in Spanish.

    I remind you, I live in Argentina and here there are many Chinese guitars! horrible, very bad!

    A hug to everyone!

  • #2
    The trem (JT-500) is wrong for an RR3. They all come with a JT-580.
    Looks like an RX10D.

    Also, all RR3's made after 1996 also come with front loaded controls.
    -Rick

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by vorticehm View Post
      This guitar is?

      Burgundy?
      I live on the edge of danger facing life and death every single day.....then I leave her at home and go disarm bombs.

      Comment


      • #4
        Cheapass import?
        Fuck ebay, fuck paypal

        "Finger on the trigger, back against the wall. Counting rounds and voices, not enough to kill them all" (Ihsahn).

        Comment


        • #5
          But it is Japanese or not?
          It seemed I was not a RR3 ...


          Sorry about my English. I'm Argentine and I have trouble enough writing for you ... But it is the best forum with the best information I've seen.

          Greetings

          Comment


          • #6
            The serial number indicates it was made in Japan.
            This is provided that the neck plate is original to the guitar.
            -Rick

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by wilkinsi View Post
              Cheapass import?
              how mature..

              Comment


              • #8
                Following up on rjohnstone's posts: This is definitely an RX10D (rear loaded). The JT-500 indicates Made in India, so this would be either 2000 or 2001. That plate looks weird, I'll have to check my MIJ plates from that era when I get home. The plate is most likely from another guitar (serial indicates 2003).

                I concur this is not an early RR3 because: -wrong color, wrong trem, wrong headstock info.
                "Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RacerX View Post
                  Following up on rjohnstone's posts: This is definitely an RX10D (rear loaded). The JT-500 indicates Made in India, so this would be either 2000 or 2001. That plate looks weird, I'll have to check my MIJ plates from that era when I get home. The plate is most likely from another guitar (serial indicates 2003).

                  I concur this is not an early RR3 because: -wrong color, wrong trem, wrong headstock info.
                  Everything you say is what I think. This guitar is for sale on a site similar to Ebay here in Argentina. You will know the risks of buying online.
                  I'm thinking ... if you yourself have doubts about the guitar, I should not go to look ...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by wilkinsi View Post
                    Cheapass import?
                    Originally posted by Grahf View Post
                    how mature..
                    Sorry, but there are things I do not understand they mean ... :think:

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      not a jackson headstock at all. atleast not one I have seen! or the angle is off so its looks funky!!!
                      I know the old saying that the value of an opinion is generally inversely proportional to the strength with which it is held.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ps3t?
                        RATT RULES!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by john.w.lawson View Post
                          not a jackson headstock at all. atleast not one I have seen! or the angle is off so its looks funky!!!
                          It's just the camera angle. Looks legit to me.

                          Originally posted by René View Post
                          Ps3t?
                          It's an RX10D

                          The PS3T was front loaded.
                          -Rick

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by vorticehm View Post
                            Everything you say is what I think.
                            Yeah, I'm awesome!


                            Originally posted by vorticehm View Post
                            I'm thinking ... if you yourself have doubts about the guitar, I should not go to look ...
                            Oh, I did not say I had any doubts...I actually like the look of the RX10D because of the rear loaded...looks very clean compared to the front loaded RRs...believe me I have lots of RRs...my fave is my rear-loaded Kevin Bonds.

                            Bottom line is this is a Made in India 9 year old guitar with a cheap trem - the price should reflect this. Bueno suerte!
                            "Quiet, numbskulls, I'm broadcasting!" -Moe Howard, "Micro-Phonies" (1945)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Grahf View Post
                              how mature..
                              I was joking FFS.
                              Fuck ebay, fuck paypal

                              "Finger on the trigger, back against the wall. Counting rounds and voices, not enough to kill them all" (Ihsahn).

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X