Originally posted by wilkinsi
View Post
Originally posted by Pointy
View Post
I've owned a whole bunch of both USAs and Pros, and I think you can't go wrong with either. The fretwork on the Pros is very high quality, but not at the same level as USA Jacksons. In particular, the fret ends on the Pros tend not to be rounded off and can be sharper to the touch. You'll occasionally see a non-level fret on a Pro, but very rarely. The wood quality varies on both, but both are what I would consider as "professional caliber." You don't tend to get many lifeless planks from either one. USA Jacksons tend to be heavier in weight and 'denser' sounding, while the Pros can sometimes be more open and resonant but don't like to be spanked as hard.
I've read somewhere that the hardware on the Pros was cheaper, but that's not been my experience. As far as I've been able to tell, all of the hardware, including pots and switches, was identical to the USA production guitars from that same period.
Now, as to modern Japanese Jacksons, I don't think the quality control is necessarily worse, though it seems like less care is taken with the fretwork compared to the pre-1996 Japanese guitars. The hardware, however, is much worse, and many of the little touches that make Jacksons cool, like binding, inlay materials, and great paint jobs aren't there on the Japanese guitars anymore. Also, it seems like the wood quality has gone down on the Japanese guitars. I'm guessing they are less choosy about that now. Japanese Jacksons are still a good deal if you're willing to mod them, but I wouldn't characterize them as a professional caliber guitar right out of the box anymore.
Comment