If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I remember seeing a Charvel Avenger with a vintage style trem. Korean made looked alot like that but had a black trem and black tuners. Or maybe it was a Charvette
Gil
After a little more digging I believe the stamp on the OP's guitar is a date stamp. From 1989 when Grover sold completely out till about 94 there was a lot of floundering. By 94 the writing was on the wall for the eventual 2002 sale to fender. In 98 things were strained money wise at the top of the company so it makes perfect sense that IMC or AMIC at the time, starts churning out as much as they can to save the co. It wouldn't surprise me if thousands of guitars were built "off the books" and sold in bulk to make some quick cash. It would also explain why the name brand took such a hit.
Turn the volume to 10 and rip off the knob!
Currently Shredding:
2007 Jackson DK2M
1983 Kramer Pacer Special
2013 Kramer 5150 Kit
2000ish RR Knockoff refinish.
So, this thread had me wondering about all the crazy mutts out there. My conclusion at this point boils down to two things. IMC and HONDO.
Here are a couple of pics i googled up.
Pretty sure IMC was just throwing Jacksons together in korea to see what would sell.
After a little more digging I believe the stamp on the OP's guitar is a date stamp. From 1989 when Grover sold completely out till about 94 there was a lot of floundering. By 94 the writing was on the wall for the eventual 2002 sale to fender. In 98 things were strained money wise at the top of the company so it makes perfect sense that IMC or AMIC at the time, starts churning out as much as they can to save the co. It wouldn't surprise me if thousands of guitars were built "off the books" and sold in bulk to make some quick cash. It would also explain why the name brand took such a hit.
Cullens, it's good to do research, but you really are glomming on to this theory - and that's all it is, a theory - with annoying tenacity. IMO you are making educated but half-assed guesses on the origin of this guitar, I don't get why you are spinning this conspiratorial tale of "off the books" import Jacksons. FYI anything you say on here is gonna be seen all over the net, and soon enough there will be others taking this weird theory of yours as fact.
I am satisfied that the OP's guitar was IDed by knowledgeable JCFers - as a mutt or non Jackson. Why aren't you? :think:
Comment