They are good pickups of course. But frankly, the Duncan Design pickups aren't particularly bad. I'd be interested in hearing whether you find the EMG noticeably superior.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
EMG Pickups Good/Bad?
Collapse
X
-
I think EMGs are great hard hitting p'ups
the only thing I think you shouldn't do, is outfit 2 similar guitars with them
The character difference between my mahogany/maple Ibanez and mahogany/maple Warlock is negligible
and this is with 60n/81b in the Ibanez, 81n/85b in the warlock (I had 81n/85b in the Ibanez as well, which made a difference non-existent, as it is now, it's just 'slightly' thinner in character)"There's nothing taking away from the pure masculinity I possess"
-"You like Anime"
"....crap!"
Comment
-
I just picked up the 81/85 pickups tonight. I got everything except for the stereo jack and battery snap. I ended up ordering the kit to install the pickups that's comes with everything. These pickup were out of a 3 month old Godin Redline 3 and are mint the guy upgraded to Bare knuckle pickups.What would you recommend 81n/85b or 85n/81b? I am not a shredder kind of player, never have been that kind of player. I would consider myself more of a rhythm player. I would like it to be good for both styles of playing just incase I would want to do lead work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SylentCommando View PostI just picked up the 81/85 pickups tonight. I got everything except for the stereo jack and battery snap. I ended up ordering the kit to install the pickups that's comes with everything. These pickup were out of a 3 month old Godin Redline 3 and are mint the guy upgraded to Bare knuckle pickups.What would you recommend 81n/85b or 85n/81b? I am not a shredder kind of player, never have been that kind of player. I would consider myself more of a rhythm player. I would like it to be good for both styles of playing just incase I would want to do lead work.\m/ Thrash Zone \m/
Comment
-
The EMG 81 is also a fantastic choice if you want a HOT pickup (just ask Zakk Wylde!) ...yes thinner but much more CUTTING than the 85....the 85 is much warmer and my favorite though. I have 81's in several guitars and 85's in several others....like 'em both the same just different. I also agree, you will not hear as much difference between guitars of differing woods as you would with a passive pickup ....EMG's seem to be VERY consistent from wood to wood....I hope I made sense thereKahler...Killing guitar values DEAD since 1981.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Hellraiser6502;1636443]I....and I agree with MOST here the 85 bridge and the 60 Neck is the best combination ....the 85 is an awesome pickup./QUOTE]
So, a 60 will it be. Thanks everyone!
Comment
-
85 in the bridge 81 in the neck is much more balanced sounding to me.
You can leave your ground wires in place just tape the end so they don't contact anything.
Not a huge EMG fan but they don't sound bad.Really? well screw Mark Twain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SylentCommando View PostI have never owned active pickups, so I am just interested in what people think of them. I have always used passive Dimarzio pickups,and I had a DXMG Dinky with EMG HZ pickups and I thought they sounded great. I know their is a lot of hate on the HZ's. I can get a EMG 81/85 set for $120, I want to upgrade my newly acquired Jackson DR3 guitar which has Duncan Design neck and bridge. I was going to get a Dimarzio Super 2 for the neck and Super Distortion for the bridge. I know a lot of people either dislike EMG's or Love them. Any help would be appreciated Thanks.
Actives are the "great neutralizers."
Tube amp? Solid-state analog? Digital? All you hear are the EMG's. Maple, mahogany, basswood? All you hear are the EMG's. There are some aural differences, but unless you have a finely-tuned ear you're not gonna catch it, and if you're raised on actives then it's not hard to imagine them making a person deaf to the variations of sound and tone caused by woods, amps, etc.
They in their efforts to ensure a given output of gain and tone destroy the subtleties of amps, shapes, woods, etc that I personally like finding in guitars in amps.
And I just don't like them because of that.
Even the way you pick and play which on passive pups does effect their sound becomes largely flat-lined by the controlled output of the actives.
They're great if you want to guarantee a wall of gain in ny given circumstance, but if you want tonal subtlety, then well they're just not my thing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sephiroth View PostTube amp? Solid-state analog? Digital? All you hear are the EMG's. Maple, mahogany, basswood? All you hear are the EMG's.
Okay, maybe not "completely." The exaggerated frequency response of certain EMG pickups (e.g. the 81) does mean that you can sort of tell a guitar is equipped with them regardless of the rest of the setup, but neither I nor a plethora of other players or listeners has any trouble distinguishing between any of my four guitars equipped with the 81 nor between my two amps when played with said guitars.Last edited by metalhobo; 12-29-2015, 04:12 PM.
Comment
-
-
I have a mahogany ltd 81 bridge 85 neck, a friend has the same set up in a mahogany jackson, they sound worlds apart. EMGs do have an obvious sound that's shared in any given situation but they never sound close to the same no matter what they're in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by toejam View PostEMGs sound more consistent, but definitely not exactly the same in every guitar. Wood does play a role.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sephiroth View PostMy personal opinion. I am sure many will disagree:The 2nd Amendment: America's Original Homeland Defense.
Comment
Comment