There seems to be conflicting information on this. I've seen 12"-16", which is I believe the standard Jackson compound radius. I have also seen 14"-16" listed, which I thought might have been exclusive to the MG line? I tried to print out the radius tool to use on my DXMG but I couldn't cut accurately enough to be 100%. Anyone know?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"MG" Series Neck Radius
Collapse
X
-
I've never heard anything other than 12"-16", and I don't see what benefit there would be to make one series in another radius span. It would likely just make overall costs higher. It doesn't seem logical to go to a higher radius for the "chord end" either. My guess is that it was originally a typo that stuck around.
-
Thanks guys. I wanted a new locking nut, and bought a 14" based on the literature that I found, as well as the memory that I had from way back when. I had an 08 DXMG and 08 DK2M, and I would have sworn up and down that the necks were different, as well as the DK2 having a thicker neck. Once I saw the incorrect 14"-16" I figured that was the difference, even though looking at the spec sheet in present day the DXMG has a thicker neck.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guitarkid8 View PostThanks guys. I wanted a new locking nut, and bought a 14" based on the literature that I found, as well as the memory that I had from way back when. I had an 08 DXMG and 08 DK2M, and I would have sworn up and down that the necks were different, as well as the DK2 having a thicker neck. Once I saw the incorrect 14"-16" I figured that was the difference, even though looking at the spec sheet in present day the DXMG has a thicker neck.I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Comment
-
Generally, DXMG's always had thicker necks than a DK2 or DK2M. Something like: DK2M .810 12th fret/ DXMG .880 12th fret.
Neck dimensions can be inconsistent, though.96xxxxx, 97xxxxx and 98xxxxx serials oftentimes don't indicate '96, '97 and '98.
Comment
Comment