Originally posted by VitaminG
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Help! Mystery Jackson Soloist Prototype?
Collapse
X
-
Some more random thoughts after re-reading the thread on TheGearPage, I noticed there was one mention of speculation that it was a SLAT-3 prototype; unless the mystery Soloist has an arched top, which I don't see in the photos you've shared so far, it would not be a SLAT-anything. In the first photo, I see a forearm comfort bevel, which is absent on all SLAT models (no need for a forearm bevel on an archtop guitar since the entire perimeter of the guitar is thinner than the core of the body).
Related to the above, that bevel, in combination with the flametop, suggests the flametop is not a cap, but a thin veneer that is bent to follow the contour of the bevel. I'm pretty positive this was how "flametop" Jacksons were done in the 2000s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Number Of The Priest View PostSome more random thoughts after re-reading the thread on TheGearPage, I noticed there was one mention of speculation that it was a SLAT-3 prototype; unless the mystery Soloist has an arched top, which I don't see in the photos you've shared so far, it would not be a SLAT-anything. In the first photo, I see a forearm comfort bevel, which is absent on all SLAT models (no need for a forearm bevel on an archtop guitar since the entire perimeter of the guitar is thinner than the core of the body).
Related to the above, that bevel, in combination with the flametop, suggests the flametop is not a cap, but a thin veneer that is bent to follow the contour of the bevel. I'm pretty positive this was how "flametop" Jacksons were done in the 2000s.
Comment
-
I'm thinking since it has a production serial number on it, it could be from a small batch run. Musicians Friend and Sam Ash are known for doing these oddball spec'd runs.
The mix of MOP logo, MOTO inlays, and the JT-500 trem, since the JT-590 was no longer in production for Jackson in 2001, it's most likely part of dealer exclusive run.-Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjohnstone View PostI'm thinking since it has a production serial number on it, it could be from a small batch run. Musicians Friend and Sam Ash are known for doing these oddball spec'd runs.
The mix of MOP logo, MOTO inlays, and the JT-500 trem, since the JT-590 was no longer in production for Jackson in 2001, it's most likely part of dealer exclusive run.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjohnstone View PostI'm thinking since it has a production serial number on it, it could be from a small batch run. Musicians Friend and Sam Ash are known for doing these oddball spec'd runs.
The mix of MOP logo, MOTO inlays, and the JT-500 trem, since the JT-590 was no longer in production for Jackson in 2001, it's most likely part of dealer exclusive run.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carbuff View PostThis is the first thing that came to mind for me too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Customguitars87 View PostIt makes sense to me, but then the question is how do I go about verifying/ID-ing it as such? Plenty of documentation online about other special runs by Jackson, but nothing about this particular guitar...
I have a hard enough time trying to track down and verify MF runs, but any dealer can request a run if they order enough of them.-Rick
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjohnstone View PostJackson doesn't track the runs, so you have to find the merchant that requested it.
I have a hard enough time trying to track down and verify MF runs, but any dealer can request a run if they order enough of them.
I just got it back from my tech so I'll take a few more photos tonight, dig into the cavities in the back and get some pics of the pots, trem, and anything else that may help. I did confirm the serial just now so this is definitely a 2001 (01XXXX). Really glad that it's a pre-FMIC too, I'm not a big fan of the direction the company took after Fender bought 'em.
Comment
-
Ok, more pics to see if that helps anything. Definite ebony fretboard, definitely not played too much as evidenced by the plastic still on the back of the tuners...and interestingly enough Korean pots (though I guess that's not uncommon even if the guitar is made in Japan). Everything does look pretty stock, I don't think anything was ever modded on this guitar but I'm no expert.
Comment
-
Thanks for the extra pics. I agree with everyone who previously guessed the tremolo is a JT500. You can read more about it here: http://audiozone.dk/index-filer/Trem...ject.htm#jt500 Interesting choice for a tremolo in 2001. The trem, and the plastic inlays, are the surprising "cheap" aspects of the guitar considering the contrast with the higher-end features like the EMGs with purposeful battery box, ebony fretboard, MOP headstock logo, and neck/headstock binding.
FIVE trem springs!
Not much more for me to diagnose but I'm staying tuned in case more definitive answers come along. There is the possibility this guitar may never be properly identified, but the hunt for information is part of the fun. The journey can be enjoyable as the destination.Last edited by Number Of The Priest; 05-17-2018, 07:26 AM.
Comment
-
Doesn't exactly look like the trem for that route, as it looks like the top rubbed against the wall and I can see slight chips near the the bass side trem post. And the intonation looks off with the saddles being too far forward.I feel my soul go cold... only the dead are smiling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by toejam View PostDoesn't exactly look like the trem for that route, as it looks like the top rubbed against the wall and I can see slight chips near the the bass side trem post. And the intonation looks off with the saddles being too far forward.
Comment
Comment