Is this a DK2 and if so what year from the other thread with pics

[JJ119]

The thread linked earlier says the serial is 9847836, which would make it a 2009.
looks like a DK2 to me, possibly the headstock binding just not as obvious in the photo

Yes, the Headstock and Neck is fully bound.

[Weev69]

The thread linked earlier says the serial is 9847836, which would make it a 2009.
looks like a DK2 to me, possibly the headstock binding just not as obvious in the photo

[john.w.lawson]

Very strange that there is neck binding, but no headstock binding. What neck models were configured this way? I cannot recall any.

Black hardware and Seymour Duncan pickups indicate 2006-2011 but that still doesn't answer why the headstock is devoid of binding.

In the other thread (https://www.jcfonline.com/forum/equi...16#post2547116), the owner himself (LiveeviL2000) is curious about the guitar, but not curious enough to consider disassembling the neck from the body. In my experience that is the surefire solution to solving the mystery. The neck pocket and neck heel would have the date stamps and model name stamps that would have the conclusive evidence. Alas, I leave it to the owner to decide whether it is worthwhile. In my opinion, it is not a difficult procedure, and the reward outweighs the inconvenience, but I remember when I was a teenager who was afraid to disassemble guitars in fear that "I'll screw it up and I won't be able to get it back the way it was before" which is silly in retrospect because electric guitars like these are completely adjustable to a very fine degree and you learn so much by disassembling and reassembling your guitar.

Thanks

[john.w.lawson]

John... it's got all the characteristics of an early/mid 2000's DK2 body (HSS config was used up until 2006/2007).
That neck came off of another model Jackson.
All DK2 necks have binding around the headstock.
Most likely a parts guitar. Not bad looking.

thanks

[Number Of The Priest]

Very strange that there is neck binding, but no headstock binding. What neck models were configured this way? I cannot recall any.

Black hardware and Seymour Duncan pickups indicate 2006-2011 but that still doesn't answer why the headstock is devoid of binding.

In the other thread (https://www.jcfonline.com/forum/equi...16#post2547116), the owner himself (LiveeviL2000) is curious about the guitar, but not curious enough to consider disassembling the neck from the body. In my experience that is the surefire solution to solving the mystery. The neck pocket and neck heel would have the date stamps and model name stamps that would have the conclusive evidence. Alas, I leave it to the owner to decide whether it is worthwhile. In my opinion, it is not a difficult procedure, and the reward outweighs the inconvenience, but I remember when I was a teenager who was afraid to disassemble guitars in fear that "I'll screw it up and I won't be able to get it back the way it was before" which is silly in retrospect because electric guitars like these are completely adjustable to a very fine degree and you learn so much by disassembling and reassembling your guitar.

[rjohnstone]

John... it's got all the characteristics of an early/mid 2000's DK2 body (HSS config was used up until 2006/2007).
That neck came off of another model Jackson.
All DK2 necks have binding around the headstock.
Most likely a parts guitar. Not bad looking.

[john.w.lawson]

That's Great Info about the Scallop, right there.

Hope this is bigger
It's the guitar , Not IMO a DK2

A.jpg

[JJ119]

Neck is not right for that guitar. The standard DK2 necks had full binding. This one pictured doesn't have any headstock binding.
The body looks legit. The lower horn scallop was used on all painted bodies. Natural finishes didn't have the scallop.

That's Great Info about the Scallop, right there.

[JJ119]

Oh, don't get mad because I put my face from today up

No Worries.

I wish I had found this place a lot sooner.
Salt & Pepper
Vinegar & Jalapenos

It's a great mix of people!

Enablers, Definitely.

[LiveeviL2000]

Is that the same guitar? The photos in the first post have black hardware, while the new headstock photos have chrome hardware.

The black hardware is mine. I believe the other post was for comparison purposes.

[john.w.lawson]

Is that the same guitar? The photos in the first post have black hardware, while the new headstock photos have chrome hardware.

you know what a DK2 is , I only hade 1

[Number Of The Priest]

Is that the same guitar? The photos in the first post have black hardware, while the new headstock photos have chrome hardware.

[pianoguyy]

wait----
so then, these aren't the photos he just tried to post

[john.w.lawson]

that busted headstock isn't going to win you any awards

waiting

[john.w.lawson]

that busted headstock isn't going to win you any awards

I was just showing the binding
If you have problem? I will settle it