If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
[ QUOTE ]
You guys think the Archtop Pro is better than the 1991 LTD AT?
[/ QUOTE ]
GRRRRR !! Don't get me started !! I missed out on one of those in some Hollywood auction thing !! I coulda had a MINT one for $525.00 !!!!!! ARGGGHHHH !!!!!! Still pissed !! So, although I'm still yet to play one, I'll agree that you're probably right ! [img]/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif[/img]
I have a KV Pro Dave Mustaine Sig right now, and it most certainly isn't well made. Well, structurally, and cosmetically it is awesome, but the fretwork is awful, a real embarassment to Jackson. The fret ends are rough as hell, and there are all kinds of high frets. I am currently doing a whole fret job on it. I should also mention that this thing has almost no play wear whatsoever.
[ QUOTE ]
I have a KV Pro Dave Mustaine Sig right now, and it most certainly isn't well made. Well, structurally, and cosmetically it is awesome, but the fretwork is awful, a real embarassment to Jackson. The fret ends are rough as hell, and there are all kinds of high frets. I am currently doing a whole fret job on it. I should also mention that this thing has almost no play wear whatsoever.
Zeegler, you had tha King V Pro since it was new? If so, why did you take ownership of it after realizing the frets were so bad. If used, how are you certain previous owners didn't fuck with it?
"Got a crazy feeling I don't understand,
Gotta get away from here.
Feelin' like I shoulda kept my feet on the ground
Waitin' for the sun to appear..."
[ QUOTE ]
Zeegler, you had tha King V Pro since it was new? If so, why did you take ownership of it after realizing the frets were so bad. If used, how are you certain previous owners didn't fuck with it?
[/ QUOTE ]
The guitar belongs to my other guitar player, who bought it from a mutual friend of ours. He bought it brand new, and only had it for a very short time before he sold it. My other guitar player is one of those guys who is a fantastic guitar player, but is an idiot when it come to equipment.
To be honest though, even crappy frets would not stop me buying something if the price was right. I can fix anything! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with heartfielder , joe web and Fifth_Horseman the Archtop Pro is the best.I like heartfielder want one with a trem.Here is a pic of my two.
[/ QUOTE ]
Gorgeous! Beautiful finishes on both of them, and the inlays look fantastic! Does the Amber on say "Professional" on the headstock?
[ QUOTE ]
Gorgeous! Beautiful finishes on both of them, and the inlays look fantastic! Does the Amber on say "Professional" on the headstock?
jim
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks man ,they are my favorites.The amber one does not say "Professional on the headstock.I think it is a factory fuck up it also has a Charvel serial number on it.It could be one of the first ones made or even prototype , who knows.I guess it could be considered a bit more valuable , but it is still a Japanese guitar and not a USA.
Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SLS TG // SLATQH TSB // 2 CS Soloists both 24.75 scale // 5 Archtop PROs //
Comment